21 Assessing the Fit of Item Response Theory Models
Authors:
- Hariharan SwaminathanHSHariharan Swaminathan
- Ronald K. HambletonRHRonald K. Hambleton
- H. Jane RogersHRH. Jane Rogers
- 1 January 2006
- book chapter
- Published by Elsevier
- Vol. 26, 683-718
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of NOHARM and DETECT in Item Cluster Recovery: Counting Dimensions and Allocating ItemsJournal of Educational Measurement, 2005
- Assessing the Dimensionality of Item Response Matrices with Small Sample Sizes and Short Test LengthsApplied Measurement in Education, 1998
- Local Dependence Indexes for Item Pairs Using Item Response TheoryJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1997
- Using an Approximate Chi‐Square Statistic to Test the Number of Dimensions Underlying the Responses to a Set of ItemsJournal of Educational Measurement, 1996
- Full-Information Item Factor AnalysisApplied Psychological Measurement, 1988
- Marginal Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Item Parameters: Application of an EM AlgorithmPsychometrika, 1981
- A Rating Formulation for Ordered Response CategoriesPsychometrika, 1978
- A Goodness of Fit Test for the Rasch ModelPsychometrika, 1973
- Estimating Item Parameters and Latent Ability when Responses are Scored in Two or More Nominal CategoriesPsychometrika, 1972
- The Use of Maximum Likelihood Estimates in $\chi^2$ Tests for Goodness of FitThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1954