Improved Assessment of Middle Ear Recurrent Cholesteatomas Using a Fusion of Conventional CT and Non-EPI-DWI MRI
Open Access
- 14 August 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR) in American Journal of Neuroradiology
- Vol. 40 (9) , 1546-1551
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recurrent middle ear cholesteatomas are commonly preoperatively assessed using MR imaging (non-EPI-DWI) and CT. Both modalities are used with the aim of distinguishing scar tissue from cholesteatoma and determining the extent of bone erosions. Inflammation and scar tissue associated with the lesions might hamper a proper delineation of the corresponding extensions on CT images. Using surgical findings as the criterion standard, we assessed the recurrent middle ear cholesteatoma extent using either uncoregistered or fused CT–MR imaging datasets and determined the corresponding accuracy and repeatability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with suspected recurrent middle ear cholesteatoma and preoperative CT–MR imaging datasets were prospectively included. A double-blind assessment and coregistration of the recurrent middle ear cholesteatoma extent and manual delineation of 18 presumed recurrent middle ear cholesteatomas were performed by 2 radiologists and compared with the criterion standard. “Reliability score” was defined to qualify radiologists9 confidence. For each volume, segmentation repeatability was assessed on the basis of intraclass correlation coefficient and overlap indices. RESULTS: For the whole set of patients, recurrent middle ear cholesteatoma was further supported by surgical results. Two lesions were excluded from the analysis, given that MR imaging did not show a restricted diffusion. Lesions were accurately localized using the fused datasets, whereas significantly fewer lesions (85%) were correctly localized using uncoregistered images. Reliability scores were larger for fused datasets. Segmentation repeatability showed an almost perfect intraclass correlation coefficient regarding volumes, while overlaps were significantly lower in uncoregistered (52%) compared with fused (60%, P < .001) datasets. CONCLUSIONS: The use of coregistered CT–MR images significantly improved the assessment of recurrent middle ear cholesteatoma with a greater accuracy and better reliability and repeatability.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prostate Cancer Localization Using Multiparametric MR Imaging: Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert ScalesRadiology, 2013
- Functional imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with diffusion-weighted MRI and FDG PET/CT: quantitative analysis of ADC and SUVEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2013
- Fusion of MRIs and CT Scans for Surgical Treatment of Cholesteatoma of the Middle Ear in ChildrenJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 2010
- Geometrical Analysis of Radiotherapy Target Volume Delineation: a Systematic Review of Reported Comparison MethodsClinical Oncology, 2010
- Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: Non–Echo-planar Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging versus Delayed Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging—Value in DetectionRadiology, 2010
- Neuroradiology of CholesteatomasAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology, 2010
- Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma Differ from Abscess and Cholesteatoma Admixed InfectionAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology, 2009
- Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging Sequence in the Detection of Postoperative Recurrent CholesteatomaRadiology, 2006
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Body Trunk Using a Single-Slab, 3-Dimensional, T2-weighted Turbo-Spin-Echo Sequence With High Sampling Efficiency (SPACE) for High Spatial Resolution ImagingInvestigative Radiology, 2005
- Can MRI Replace a Second Look Operation in Cholesteatoma Surgery?Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 1999