“…pretty much all white, and most of them are psychiatrists and men”: Mixed-methods analysis of influence and challenges in global mental health
Open Access
- 5 March 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS Global Public Health
- Vol. 5 (3) , e0003923
Abstract
Mental health is increasingly recognised as a global health priority, with ‘global mental health’ gaining relevance as a field. We thus aimed to identify the most influential actors in global mental health and key challenges in the design and implementation of policies and interventions within this relatively nascent field, to provide suggestions on how mental health could be promoted and diversified at the global level to improve mental health outcomes. We conducted a mixed-methods study, incorporating a social network analysis of 115 experts to identify the most influential mental health actors and elements globally and 30 semi-structured key informant interviews, analysed thematically, to examine key challenges in developing the field. We found concentrated influence among a few actors, with network analysis highlighting psychiatry followed by psychology as most influential specialties, and academia as the most influential sector; limited global collaboration and political engagement; and the need for greater professional, socio-cultural, geographical, and gender diversity. Sustaining mental health prioritisation globally requires directed and coordinated efforts from influential individual and institutional actors in the global mental health field. This requires critical engagement with dominant modes of knowledge production, greater synergy at global, national, and community levels, and agenda setting by a broader and more equitable coalition of global mental health actors across professional, cultural, and gender differences.Keywords
Funding Information
- Singapore Population Health Research Impact Centre (026)
- Singapore Population Health Research Impact Centre (026)
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- The biomedical model of mental disorder: A critical analysis of its validity, utility, and effects on psychotherapy researchClinical Psychology Review, 2013
- Global Mental Health: From Science to ActionHarvard Review of Psychiatry, 2012
- Nepali Concepts of Psychological Trauma: The Role of Idioms of Distress, Ethnopsychology and Ethnophysiology in Alleviating Suffering and Preventing StigmaCulture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 2010
- Towards a common definition of global healthThe Lancet, 2009
- Scale up services for mental disorders: a call for actionThe Lancet, 2007
- Barriers to improvement of mental health services in low-income and middle-income countriesThe Lancet, 2007
- No health without mental healthThe Lancet, 2007
- Priority setting in health – a political economy perspectiveHealth Economics, Policy and Law, 2005
- Postpsychiatry: a new direction for mental healthBMJ, 2001
- Depression, somatization and the “new cross-cultural psychiatry”Social Science & Medicine (1967), 1977