Plant Proteins and Bioactive Peptides: Distinguishing Nutritional Quality from Sequence-Dependent Bioactivity
Authors:
- Tatevik SargsyanTatevik Sargsyan
- Heghine HakobyanHHHeghine Hakobyan
- Hasmik GrigoryanHGHasmik Grigoryan
- Lala StepanyanLSLala Stepanyan
- Anahit HovhannisyanAHAnahit Hovhannisyan
- Zhaklina SaribekyanZSZhaklina Saribekyan
- Avetis TsaturyanATAvetis Tsaturyan
- Nelli HovhannisyanNHNelli Hovhannisyan
- Ashot SaghyanASAshot Saghyan
- Caterina VicidominiCaterina Vicidomini
- Rosanna PalumboRPRosanna Palumbo
- Giovanni N. RovielloGiovanni N. Roviello
Open Access
Abstract
Plant proteins represent both important nutritional resources and reservoirs of encrypted bioactive peptide sequences. However, protein nutritional quality and peptide bioactivity are distinct properties: a favorable indispensable amino acid profile or high digestibility does not necessarily predict the generation of biologically active peptides. This review examines plant-derived proteins and peptides with particular emphasis on the relationship between parent-protein composition, peptide release, sequence-dependent activity, analytical identification, and biological validation. The relevant peer-reviewed literature was critically evaluated, with detailed search and selection criteria. Major plant protein sources, peptide-generation strategies, purification and mass-spectrometric characterization approaches, and reported antioxidant, antimicrobial, antihypertensive, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, and other regulatory activities are discussed. Particular attention is given to experimentally validated peptide sequences and to the hierarchy of evidence from computational prediction and biochemical assays to cellular, animal, and human studies. Structure–activity relationships are interpreted cautiously, recognizing that peptide length, charge, hydrophobicity, and individual amino acid residues are contributory rather than independently predictive features. The review further integrates computational prediction with experimental validation and highlights gastrointestinal stability, intestinal transport, bioavailability, safety, scalability, and regulatory considerations as major translational challenges. This evidence-based framework distinguishes nutritional adequacy from peptide function and supports more rigorous development of plant-derived bioactive peptides for functional-food, nutraceutical, and related applications.Keywords
Funding Information
- Higher Education and Science Committee of MESCS RA (24WS-1D012)
This publication has 176 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of spring rape varieties on protein extraction from press cake, emulsifying properties and antinutrient contentJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2026
- A Review of Current Computational Tools for Peptide–Protein DockingJournal of Computational Chemistry, 2026
- Clinical insights into the immunomodulatory effects of food‐derived peptidesFood Frontiers, 2024
- Nutritional profile, bioactive properties and potential health benefits of buckwheat: A reviewEfood, 2024
- Incorporation of spray‐dried encapsulated bioactive peptides from coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) meal by‐product in bread formulationFood Science & Nutrition, 2024
- Use of olive and sunflower protein hydrolysates for the physical and oxidative stabilization of fish oil‐in‐water emulsionsJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2024
- Guidelines for the digestive enzymes inhibition assayEfood, 2022
- Antihypertensive effect of quinoa protein under simulated gastrointestinal digestion and peptide characterizationJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2020
- In vitro antioxidant and angiotensin I‐converting enzyme inhibitory properties of enzymatically hydrolyzed quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) and kiwicha (Amaranthus caudatus) proteinsCereal Chemistry, 2020
- Effect of soaking, germination, cooking and fermentation on antinutritional factors in cowpeasMolecular Nutrition & Food Research, 2002