Statin use and outcome risks according to predicted CVD risk in Korea: A retrospective cohort study
Author:
Open Access
- 15 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 16 (1) , e0245609
Abstract
The validity of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk calculators in decision for statin therapy has not been fully evaluated at a population level. This study aimed to examine the net benefits of statins according to predicted CVD risk. A cohort of 40 to 79-year-old Korean adults without CVD was generated from the National Health Information Database 2006–2017. Major CVD event rates and all-cause mortality in 58,265 users who initiated statins during 2007–2010 were compared with those in 58,265 nonusers matched on propensity scores, from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2017. Additionally, simulation was performed for the population-based cohort of 659,759 adults. CVD risk was predicted using the 2018 revised Pooled Cohort Equations. In propensity score-matched cohort, the CVD hazard ratios (95% CIs) in occasional, intermittent, and regular statin users were 1.06 (0.93–1.20), 0.82 (0.70–0.97), and 0.57 (0.50–0.64), respectively. The corresponding mortality hazard ratios were 1.01 (0.92–1.10), 0.87 (0.78–0.98), and 0.71 (0.66–0.77), respectively. In stratified analyses, the relative risk reductions were similar, irrespective of age, sex, or predicted CVD risk. Accordingly, absolute risk reductions were greater in higher risk categories. In 6-year follow-up simulation cohorts, regular statin use could reduce 17 CVDs and 28 deaths in 1000 adults with a 10-year risk of ≥10.0% vs 10 CVDs and 14 deaths in 1000 with ≥2 major risk factors. However, in actual adults with a risk of ≥10%, statin use was insufficient and estimated to reduce 3 CVDs and 4 deaths in 1000. Limitations of this study include assessment of medication use based on the prescription data, lack of information on the intensity of statins, and limited generalizability to individuals with very old age or other ethnicity. CVD risk calculators were valid in decision-making for primary prevention statin therapy. Proper risk assessment and regular statin use in patients at high predicted risk would reduce outcome risks much more than present in Asian populations.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statins: new American guidelines for prevention of cardiovascular diseaseThe Lancet, 2013
- Statin Use and Risk of Diabetes Mellitus in Postmenopausal Women in the Women's Health InitiativeArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2012
- Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2010
- Statins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trialsThe Lancet, 2010
- Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity‐score matched samplesStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- Rosuvastatin to Prevent Vascular Events in Men and Women with Elevated C-Reactive ProteinNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial—Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2003
- TIME-DEPENDENT COVARIATES IN THE COX PROPORTIONAL-HAZARDS REGRESSION MODELAnnual Review of Public Health, 1999
- Primary Prevention of Acute Coronary Events With Lovastatin in Men and Women With Average Cholesterol LevelsJAMA, 1998
- Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease with Pravastatin in Men with HypercholesterolemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995