A Critical Review of the Use of Wildlife Conservation Canines in Species-at-Risk Research
- 21 October 2023
- book chapter
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 375-440
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 122 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effectiveness of search dogs compared with human observers in locating bat carcasses at wind‐turbine sites: A blinded randomized trialWildlife Society Bulletin, 2013
- Using Detection Dogs to Conduct Simultaneous Surveys of Northern Spotted (Strix occidentalis caurina) and Barred Owls (Strix varia)PLOS ONE, 2012
- Evidence that ship noise increases stress in right whalesProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2012
- Resource Selection and Its Implications for Wide-Ranging Mammals of the Brazilian CerradoPLOS ONE, 2011
- Comparing detection dog and livetrapping surveys for a cryptic rodentThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 2011
- Scent‐Matching Dogs Determine Number of Unique Individuals From ScatThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 2009
- Comparison of Effects of Humans Versus Wildlife-Detector DogsThe Southwestern Naturalist, 2008
- A Preliminary Evaluation on the Use of Dogs to Recover Bat Fatalities at Wind Energy FacilitiesWildlife Society Bulletin, 2006
- Efficacy of Scent Dogs in Detecting Black-Footed Ferrets at a Reintroduction Site in South DakotaWildlife Society Bulletin, 2006
- Scat detection dogs in wildlife research and management: application to grizzly and black bears in the Yellowhead Ecosystem, Alberta, CanadaCanadian Journal of Zoology, 2004