Why discrepancies in searching the conservation biology literature matter
Authors:
- Michael C. CalverMCMichael C. Calver
- Barry GoldmanBGBarry Goldman
- Patricia A. HutchingsPHPatricia A. Hutchings
- Richard T. KingsfordRKRichard T. Kingsford
Open Access
- 1 September 2017
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Biological Conservation
- Vol. 213, 19-26
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Beyond global change: lessons from 25 years of CO2 researchOecologia, 2013
- A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessmentsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010
- Trouble with the Gray LiteratureBiotropica, 2010
- Patterns of Citations of Open Access and Non‐Open Access Conservation Biology Journal Papers and Book ChaptersConservation Biology, 2010
- Calculating the h‐index and other bibliometric and scientometric indicators from Google Scholar with the Publish or Perish softwareOnline Information Review, 2009
- Electronic Publication and the Narrowing of Science and ScholarshipScience, 2008
- Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysisEthics in Science and Environmental Politics, 2008
- The Triumph of Expediency: The Impact of Google Scholar on Library InstructionJournal of Library Administration, 2008
- Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluationsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007
- Does the student's love of the search engine mean that high quality online academic resources are being missed?Performance Measurement and Metrics, 2005