Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study of Vandetanib Plus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Authors:
- Bruce E. JohnsonBJBruce E. Johnson
- Diane PragerDPDiane Prager
- Edit CsadaECEdit Csada
- Jaromír RoubecJRJaromír Roubec
- Miloš PešekMPMiloš Pešek
- Irena ŠpásováIŠIrena Špásová
- Chandra P. BelaniCBChandra P. Belani
- István BodrogiIBIstván Bodrogi
- Shirish GadgeelSGShirish Gadgeel
- Sarah J. KennedySKSarah J. Kennedy
- Jeannie HouJHJeannie Hou
- 20 September 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 25 (27) , 4270-4277
Abstract
Purpose: Vandetanib is a once-daily oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 and epidermal growth factor receptor kinase activity. The activity of vandetanib plus docetaxel was assessed in patients with previously treated non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: This two-part study comprised an open-label run-in phase and a double-blind randomized phase. Eligible patients had locally advanced or metastatic (stage IIIB/IV) NSCLC after failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary objective of the randomized phase was to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in patients receiving vandetanib (100 or 300 mg/d) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2 intravenous infusion every 21 days) versus placebo plus docetaxel. The study was designed to have more than 75% power to detect 50% prolongation at a one-sided significance level of P < .20. Secondary objectives included objective response rate, overall survival, safety and tolerability. Results: In the randomized phase (n = 127), median PFS was 18.7 weeks for vandetanib 100 mg plus docetaxel (n = 42; hazard ratio v docetaxel = 0.64; one-sided P = .037); 17.0 weeks for vandetanib 300 mg plus docetaxel (n = 44; hazard ratio v docetaxel = 0.83; one-sided P = .231); and 12 weeks for docetaxel (n = 41). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival among the three treatment arms. Common adverse events included diarrhea, rash, and asymptomatic prolongation of corrected QT (QTC) interval. Conclusion: The primary objective was achieved, with vandetanib 100 mg plus docetaxel demonstrating a significant prolongation of PFS compared with docetaxel in relation to the prespecified significance level. On the basis of these encouraging data, phase III evaluation of vandetanib 100 mg plus docetaxel in second-line NSCLC has been initiated.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gefitinib plus best supportive care in previously treated patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study (Iressa Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer)The Lancet, 2005
- Phase I Trial of the Oral Antiangiogenesis Agent AG-013736 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: Pharmacokinetic and Clinical ResultsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Erlotinib in Previously Treated Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Clinical evaluation of ZD6474, an orally active inhibitor of VEGF and EGF receptor signaling, in patients with solid, malignant tumorsAnnals of Oncology, 2005
- Disease associated mutations at valine 804 in the RET receptor tyrosine kinase confer resistance to selective kinase inhibitorsOncogene, 2004
- Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Bevacizumab Plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Alone in Previously Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Randomized Phase III Trial of Pemetrexed Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With ChemotherapyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors: mechanisms and prevention strategiesInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP), 2004
- Multi-Institutional Randomized Phase II Trial of Gefitinib for Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000