Value of next generation sequencing (NGS) testing in advanced cancer patients

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Aims: The availability of targeted therapies for oncology patients is increasing. Available genomic tests to identify treatment-eligible patients include single gene tests and gene panel tests, including the whole-exome, whole-transcriptome OncoExTraTM test. We assessed the costs and clinical benefits of test choice. Methods: A Microsoft Excel-based model was developed to evaluate test choice in patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. Treatment pathways were based on NCCN guidelines and medical expert opinion. Inputs were derived from published literature. Annual economic results and lifetime clinical results with OncoExTra testing were projected per-tested-patient and compared with single gene testing and no testing. Separately, results were estimated for a US health plan without the OncoExTra test and with its use in 5% of patients. Results: Compared with no genomic testing, OncoExTra test use increased costs by $4,915 per patient; however, 82%-92% of individuals across tumor types were identified as eligible for targeted therapy or a clinical trial. Compared with single gene testing, OncoExTra test use decreased costs by $9,966 per-patient-tested while increasing use of approved or investigational targeted therapies by 20%. When considering a hypothetical health plan with 1 million members, 858 patients were eligible for genomic testing. Using the OncoExTra test in 5% of those eligible, per-member per-month costs decreased by $0.003, ranging from cost-savings of $0.026 in NSCLC patients to a $0.009 increase in prostate cancer patients. Cost-savings were driven by reduced treatment costs with increased clinical trial enrollment and reduced direct and indirect medical costs associated with targeted treatments. Conclusions: Limitations include the required simplifications in modeling complex conditions that may not fully reflect evolving real-world testing and treatment patterns. Compared to single-gene testing, results indicate that using NGS test such as OncoExTra identified more actionable alterations, leading to improved outcomes and reduced costs.
Funding Information
  • Exact Sciences Corporation

This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit: