Instruments for Assessing Population Knowledge of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and/or Post-exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) for HIV: A Scoping Review
Authors:
- Renata Braga CordeiroRCRenata Braga Cordeiro
- Vitor Santos de Sá GalinaVGVitor Santos de Sá Galina
- Mayra Cardozo MendesMMMayra Cardozo Mendes
- Laura Candeias dos SantosLSLaura Candeias dos Santos
- Dyego Carlos Souza Anacleto de AraujoDADyego Carlos Souza Anacleto de Araujo
- Kérilin Stancine Santos RochaKRKérilin Stancine Santos Rocha
Open Access
- 21 July 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in AIDS and Behavior
- p. 1-28
Abstract
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) are central strategies for HIV prevention; however, a comprehensive understanding of how knowledge about these strategies is measured across different contexts remains limited. This scoping review aimed to map the instruments used to assess knowledge of PrEP and/or PEP. The study followed the recommendations of the JBI Reviewer’s Manual, with a systematic search conducted on August 27, 2024, in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Virtual Health Library, and grey literature. Original studies assessing knowledge of PrEP and/or PEP were included. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection through title and abstract screening, followed by full-text assessment. Data extraction was performed by a single researcher, and the findings were presented descriptively. A total of 1,922 records were retrieved, of which 49 studies were included. Cross-sectional studies predominated (n = 45; 91.8%), as did publications from 2020 to 2024 (n = 25; 51.0%). The instruments focused mainly on PEP (n = 27; 55.1%), followed by PrEP (n = 20; 40.8%), and were administered primarily to healthcare professionals or healthcare students (n = 35; 71.4%). The instruments varied in terms of the number of items, response formats, and scoring criteria, and showed limited reporting of their development and psychometric properties. The findings highlight substantial variability in the characteristics of instruments used to assess population knowledge of PrEP and/or PEP. Important gaps were identified in the reporting of instrument development and validation processes, reinforcing the need for methodologically robust instruments to assess population knowledge of PrEP and PEP.Keywords
Funding Information
- Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
This publication has 87 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment Tools for Evaluating Pharmacy Students’ Knowledge on HIV Prophylaxis: A Scoping ReviewAmerican Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2025
- Occupational post‐exposure prophylaxis among healthcare workers: a scoping review of factors affecting optimal utilizationJournal of the International AIDS Society, 2024
- The HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills of Parents of Adolescent Sexual Minority Males and Transgender and Gender Diverse AdolescentsSexuality Research and Social Policy, 2023
- Feasibility and desirability of screening search results from Google Search exhaustively for systematic reviews: A cross‐case analysisResearch Synthesis Methods, 2023
- The Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Continuum of Care and Correlates to Initiation Among HIV-Negative Men Recruited at Miami Gay Pride 2018Journal of Urban Health, 2019
- Limited awareness of the effective timing of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis among people with high-risk exposure to HIVEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2019
- COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measuresQuality of Life Research, 2018
- Factors Related to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Prescription by U.S. Primary Care PhysiciansAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2017
- Knowledge is Power! Increased Provider Knowledge Scores Regarding Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) are Associated with Higher Rates of PrEP Prescription and Future Intent to Prescribe PrEPAIDS and Behavior, 2015
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi studyQuality of Life Research, 2010