A Psychometric Analysis of the “Divide and Conquer” Principle in Multicriteria Decision Making
Authors:
- Osvaldo F MoreraOMOsvaldo F Morera
- David V BudescuDBDavid V Budescu
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Vol. 75 (3) , 187-206
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rank disagreement: A comparison of multi‐criteria methodologiesJournal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 1995
- SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility MeasurementOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1994
- Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessManagement Science, 1990
- Clinical Versus Actuarial JudgmentScience, 1989
- Construction of social value or utility-based health indices: The usefulness of factorial experimental design plansJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- Forecasting one's own preferenceInternational Journal of Forecasting, 1986
- A comparison of holistic and decomposed judgment strategies in job analyses by job incumbents.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980
- The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making.American Psychologist, 1979
- The use of the decomposition principle in making judgmentsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975
- Linear models in decision making.Psychological Bulletin, 1974