Use of Intensive Care Services for Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Major Surgical Procedures
Authors:
- Hannah WunschHWHannah Wunsch
- Hayley B. GershengornHGHayley B. Gershengorn
- Carmen GuerraCGCarmen Guerra
- John W. RoweJRJohn W. Rowe
Open Access
- 1 April 2016
- journal article
- critical care-medicine
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 124 (4) , 899-907
Abstract
For a large cohort of patients undergoing selected major surgical procedures, there was a wide variation in intensive care unit utilization for each procedure, with no relation to mortality. Greater systematic use of intensive care for older surgical patients in the United States undergoing selected major surgeries does not improve survival outcomes. Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: Use of intensive care after major surgical procedures and whether routinely admitting patients to intensive care units (ICUs) improve outcomes or increase costs is unknown. Methods: The authors examined frequency of admission to an ICU during the hospital stay for Medicare beneficiaries undergoing selected major surgical procedures: elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, cystectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, esophagectomy, and elective open AAA repair. The authors compared hospital mortality, length of stay, and Medicare payments for patients receiving each procedure in hospitals admitting patients to the ICU less than 50% of the time (low use), 50 to 89% (moderate use), and 90% or greater (high use), adjusting for patient and hospital factors. Results: The cohort ranged from 7,878 patients in 162 hospitals for esophagectomies to 69,989 patients in 866 hospitals for endovascular AAA. Overall admission to ICU ranged from 35.6% (endovascular AAA) to 71.3% (open AAA). Admission to ICU across hospitals ranged from less than 5% to 100% of patients for each surgical procedure. There was no association between hospital use of intensive care and mortality for any of the five surgical procedures. There was a consistent association between high use of intensive care with longer length of hospital stay and higher Medicare payments only for endovascular AAA. Conclusions: There is little consensus regarding the need for intensive care for patients undergoing major surgical procedures and no relationship between a hospital’s use of intensive care and hospital mortality. There is also no consistent relationship across surgical procedures between use of intensive care and either length of hospital stay or payments for care.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association between age and use of intensive care among surgical Medicare beneficiariesJournal of Critical Care, 2013
- Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort studyThe Lancet, 2012
- Variation in use of intensive care for adults with diabetic ketoacidosis*Critical Care Medicine, 2012
- Is There a Starling Curve for Intensive Care?Chest, 2012
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Use of Preemptive Hemodynamic Intervention to Improve Postoperative Outcomes in Moderate and High-Risk Surgical PatientsAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2011
- Triage of high-risk surgical patients for intensive careCritical Care, 2011
- Critical care medicine in the United States 2000–2005: An analysis of bed numbers, occupancy rates, payer mix, and costs*Critical Care Medicine, 2010
- Variation in critical care services across North America and Western Europe*Critical Care Medicine, 2008
- Growth of intensive care unit resource use and its estimated cost in Medicare*Critical Care Medicine, 2008
- Effect of dopexamine infusion on mortality following major surgery: Individual patient data meta-regression analysis of published clinical trialsCritical Care Medicine, 2008