Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Topical Vancomycin Powder in Primary Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
Authors:
- Eric M. CohenECEric M. Cohen
- Stephen MarcaccioSMStephen Marcaccio
- Avi D. GoodmanAGAvi D. Goodman
- Nicholas J. LemmeNLNicholas J. Lemme
- Richard LimbirdRLRichard Limbird
- 1 September 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SLACK, Inc. in Orthopedics
- Vol. 42 (5) , E430-E436
Abstract
Topical vancomycin has been shown to effectively reduce infections after spinal surgery while remaining safe and cost-effective; however, there are few studies evaluating topical vancomycin in total hip arthroplasty. The authors hypothesized that the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection would decrease with the use of topical vancomycin in total hip arthroplasty and that topical vancomycin would be cost-effective. A retrospective patient chart review was performed to evaluate consecutive primary cementless total hip arthroplasties performed in the authors' hospital system between April 2015 and December 2016. Demographic data were collected. Periprosthetic joint infection was defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Statistical analysis included t test, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression. The costs of vancomycin and postoperative infection were used to determine the absolute risk reduction (1/number needed to treat) threshold needed for topical vancomycin to be cost-effective. In this study, 309 patients (55.7%) undergoing total hip arthroplasty were treated with topical vancomycin, and 246 patients (44.3%) did not receive treatment. There were 2 infections in the vancomycin group (0.6% incidence), and 4 in the no vancomycin group (1.6% incidence). There was no statistical difference in infection rate between the 2 cohorts ( P =.414). The absolute risk reduction was 0.98%, and the number needed to treat with topical vancomycin was 102 patients to prevent 1 periprosthetic joint infection. Topical vancomycin ($12 per vial) resulted in an expected cost savings of $904 per patient. Topical vancomycin is inexpensive and cost-effective. Although not statistically significant, the topical vancomycin group had a 60% lower incidence of infection. Further research regarding appropriate prophylactic topical and intravenous antibiotic use is needed prior to widespread adoption. [ Orthopedics . 2019; 42(5):e430–e436.]Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intraoperative Vancomycin Powder Reduces Staphylococcus aureus Surgical Site Infections and Biofilm Formation on Fixation Implants in a Rabbit ModelJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2018
- Is Intraoperative Local Vancomycin Powder the Answer to Surgical Site Infections in Spine Surgery?Spine, 2017
- Vancomycin microspheres reduce postoperative spine infection in an in vivo rabbit modelBMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, 2016
- The use of local vancomycin powder in degenerative spine surgeryEuropean Spine Journal, 2015
- Intrawound Vancomycin Powder Eradicates Surgical Wound ContaminationJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2014
- Economic Burden of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in the United StatesThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2012
- Two-stage Total Hip Arthroplasty: How Often Does It Control Methicillin-resistant Infection?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- Infection in total hip replacement: meta-analysisInternational Orthopaedics, 2010
- Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Treatment OptionsOrthopedics, 2010
- Periprosthetic Joint InfectionThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2010