Asymmetrical perceptions of partisan political bots
- 16 July 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in New Media & Society
- Vol. 23 (10) , 3016-3037
Abstract
Political bots are social media algorithms that impersonate political actors and interact with other users, aiming to influence public opinion. This study investigates the ability to differentiate bots with partisan personas from humans on Twitter. Our online experiment ( N = 656) explores how various characteristics of the participants and of the stimulus profiles bias recognition accuracy. The analysis reveals asymmetrical partisan-motivated reasoning, in that conservative profiles appear to be more confusing and Republican participants perform less well in the recognition task. Moreover, Republican users are more likely to confuse conservative bots with humans, whereas Democratic users are more likely to confuse conservative human users with bots. We discuss implications for how partisan identities affect motivated reasoning and how political bots exacerbate political polarization.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing EffectsThe Journal of Politics, 2010
- Self‐Efficacy2010
- Actions, Intentions, and Self-Assessment: The Road to Self-Enhancement Is Paved with Good IntentionsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2004
- Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision MakingThe Journal of Politics, 2002
- Recognition memory and decision processes: A meta-analysis of remember, know, and guess responsesMemory, 2002
- The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?Journal of Social Issues, 1999
- Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999
- Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.Psychological Review, 1993
- The case for motivated reasoning.Psychological Bulletin, 1990
- Decision making under uncertainty: A comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1985