Waist-to-Height Ratio Cut-Off Points for Central Obesity in Individuals with Overweight Across Different Ethnic Groups in NHANES 2011–2018
Open Access
Abstract
Background: The identification of surrogate measures of central obesity is of clinical importance, and the waist-to-height ratio (WtHR) has recently attracted great interest as an alternative method. Objective: For this reason, we aimed to establish specific WtHR cut-off points for adiposity (i.e., central obesity) in four different ethnicity groups across both sexes based on data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) population. Methods: Of the total 23,037 participants who completed four cycles of the survey between the years 2011 and 2018, anthropometric measures (i.e., body weight, waist circumference, and height) and dual X-ray absorptiometry-derived visceral adipose tissue (DXA-derived VAT) results were available for 3566 individuals who were assessed in this cross-sectional study. Participants with an overweight status defined according to the World Health Organization (WHO) body mass index (BMI) cut-off points (25–29.9 kg/m2) were included. The sample was then categorized by adiposity according to the DXA-derived VAT tertiles (highest), and based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the best sensitivity and specificity were attained for predicting central obesity using the WtHR. Results: The following WtHR cut-offs were identified as having the best discriminating ability for central obesity: 0.57 for White males and 0.58 for White females; 0.55 for Black males and 0.57 for Black females; 0.56 for Asian males and 0.59 for Asian females; and 0.57 for Hispanic males and 0.59 for Hispanic females. Conclusions: These new WtHR cut-off points should be utilized in adults with overweight to screen for central adiposity based on their sex and ethnicity, and obesity guidelines therefore need to be revised accordingly.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- ‘At risk’ waist-to-height ratio cut-off points recently adopted by NICE and US Department of Defense will unfairly penalize shorter adults. What is the solution?Obesity Research & Clinical Practice, 2023
- Validity of dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry for estimation of visceral adipose tissue and visceral adipose tissue change after surgery‐induced weight loss in women with severe obesityObesity, 2022
- Cross-Sectional StudiesChest, 2020
- A simple cut-off for waist-to-height ratio (0·5) can act as an indicator for cardiometabolic risk: recent data from adults in the Health Survey for EnglandBritish Journal of Nutrition, 2019
- Determining the worldwide prevalence of obesityThe Lancet, 2018
- Clinical usefulness of abdominal bioimpedance (ViScan) in the determination of visceral fat and its application in the diagnosis and management of obesity and its comorbiditiesClinical Nutrition, 2018
- The Psychosocial Burden of ObesityEndocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America, 2016
- Associations of visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue with markers of cardiac and metabolic risk in obese adultsObesity, 2012
- Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategiesThe Lancet, 2004
- External validation is necessary in prediction research:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003