Evaluation of elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure in patients with preserved ejection fraction using cardiac magnetic resonance
- 10 January 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Radiology
- Vol. 29 (5) , 2360-2368
Abstract
Objectives This study aims to validate the reliability of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters for estimating left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and compare their accuracy to conventional echocardiographic ones, with reference to left heart catheterisation. Methods Sixty patients with exertional dyspnoea (New York Heart Association function class II to III) were consecutively enrolled. CMR-derived time-volume curve and deformation parameters, conventional echocardiographic diastolic indices as well as LVEDP evaluated by left heart catheterisation were collected and analysed. Results Fifty-one patients, who accomplished all three examinations, were divided into HFpEF group and non-HFpEF group based on LVEDP measurements. Compared to the non-HFpEF group, CMR-derived time-volume curve showed lower peak filling rate adjusted for end diastolic volume (PFR/EDV, p = 0.027), longer time to peak filling rate (T-PFR, p < 0.001), and increased T-PFR in one cardiac cycle (%T-PFR, p < 0.001) in HFpEF group. In multivariable linear regression analysis, %T-PFR (β = 0.372, p = 0.024), left ventricular global peak longitudinal diastolic strain rate (LDSR, β = −0.471, p = 0.006), and E/e’ (β = 0.547, p = 0.001) were independently associated with invasively measured LVEDP. The sensitivity and specificity of E/e’ and LDSR for predicting the elevated LVEDP were 76%, 92% and 76%, 89%, respectively. Conclusions These findings suggest that CMR-derived time-volume curve and strain indices could predict HFpEF patients. Not only E/e’ assessed by echocardiography but also the CMR-derived %T-PFR and LDSR correlated well with LVEDP. These non-invasive parameters were validated to evaluate the left ventricular diastolic function. Key Points • The abnormal time-volume curve revealed insufficient early diastole in HFpEF patients. • Non-invasive parameters including E/e’, %T-PFR, and LDSR correlated well with LVEDP.Keywords
Funding Information
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital (No.LYZY-0193)
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevalence of Multiple Chronic Conditions Among US Adults: Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, 2010Preventing Chronic Disease, 2013
- Trends in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection FractionCirculation, 2012
- CMR for Assessment of Diastolic FunctionCurrent Cardiovascular Imaging Reports, 2011
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatmentEuropean Heart Journal, 2010
- ASCI 2010 standardized practice protocol for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the Asian society of cardiovascular imaging cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging guideline working groupThe International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2010
- Impact of diastolic dysfunction severity on global left ventricular volumetric filling - assessment by automated segmentation of routine cine cardiovascular magnetic resonanceJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2010
- Pulmonary Hypertension in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection FractionJACC, 2009
- Optimal Noninvasive Assessment of Diastolic Heart Failure in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison of Tissue Doppler Echocardiography, Left Atrium Size, and Brain Natriuretic PeptideJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2008
- Diastolic Filling Parameters Derived from Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Can Predict Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure at Subsequent Cardiac CatheterizationJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2008
- Global Diastolic Strain Rate for the Assessment of Left Ventricular Relaxation and Filling PressuresCirculation, 2007