Automated analysis of flow cytometric data for measuring neutrophil CD64 expression using a multi‐instrument compatible probability state model
Authors:
Open Access
- 20 December 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry
- Vol. 88 (4) , 227-235
Abstract
Background Leuko64TM (Trillium Diagnostics) is a flow cytometric assay that measures neutrophil CD64 expression and serves as an in vitro indicator of infection/sepsis or the presence of a systemic acute inflammatory response. Leuko64 assay currently utilizes QuantiCALC, a semiautomated software that employs cluster algorithms to define cell populations. The software reduces subjective gating decisions, resulting in interanalyst variability of TM (Verity Software House) and probability state modeling (PSM). Methods Four hundred and fifty-seven human blood samples were processed using the Leuko64 assay. Samples were analyzed on four different flow cytometer models: BD FACSCanto II, BD FACScan, BC Gallios/Navios, and BC FC500. A probability state model was designed to identify calibration beads and three leukocyte subpopulations based on differences in intensity levels of several parameters. PSM automatically calculates CD64 index values for each cell population using equations programmed into the model. GemStone software uses PSM that requires no operator intervention, thus totally automating data analysis and internal quality control flagging. Expert analysis with the predicate method (QuantiCALC) was performed. Interanalyst precision was evaluated for both methods of data analysis. Results PSM with GemStone correlates well with the expert manual analysis, r2 = 0.99675 for the neutrophil CD64 index values with no intermethod bias detected. The average interanalyst imprecision for the QuantiCALC method was 1.06% (range 0.00–7.94%), which was reduced to 0.00% with the GemStone PSM. The operator-to-operator agreement in GemStone was a perfect correlation, r2 = 1.000. Conclusion Automated quantification of CD64 index values produced results that strongly correlate with expert analysis using a standard gate-based data analysis method. PSM successfully evaluated flow cytometric data generated by multiple instruments across multiple lots of the Leuko64 kit in all 457 cases. The probability-based method provides greater objectivity, higher data analysis speed, and allows for greater precision for in vitro diagnostic flow cytometric assays. © 2015 International Clinical Cytometry SocietyKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of cell‐based fluorescence assays: Practice guidelines from the ICSH and ICCS – part III – analytical issuesCytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry, 2013
- CD64-Neutrophil expression and stress metabolic patterns in early sepsis and severe traumatic brain injury in childrenBMC Pediatrics, 2013
- Neutrophil CD64: diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value in patients presenting to the emergency departmentEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2011
- Evaluation of neutrophilic CD64, interleukin 10 and procalcitonin as diagnostic markers of early- and late-onset neonatal sepsisScandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Predictive values of neutrophil CD64 expression compared with interleukin‐6 and C‐reactive protein in early diagnosis of neonatal sepsisJournal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 2010
- Beyond GatingAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2009
- A chromatic explosion: the development and future of multiparameter flow cytometryImmunology, 2008
- Mixture modeling approach to flow cytometry dataCytometry Part A, 2008
- Neutrophil and Monocyte CD64 and CD163 Expression in Critically Ill Neonates and Children with Sepsis: Comparison of Fluorescence Intensities and Calculated IndexesMediators of Inflammation, 2008
- Neutrophil CD64 expression and serum IL-8: Sensitive early markers of severity and outcome in sepsisCytokine, 2006