Frontotemporal Degeneration with Transactive Response DNA‐Binding Protein Type C at the Anterior Temporal Lobe

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The anatomical distribution of most neurodegenerative diseases shows considerable interindividual variations. In contrast, frontotemporal lobar degeneration with transactive response DNA‐binding protein type C (TDP‐C) shows a consistent predilection for the anterior temporal lobe (ATL). The relatively selective atrophy of ATL in TDP‐C patients has highlighted the importance of this region for complex cognitive and behavioral functions. This review includes observations on 28 TDP‐C patients, 18 with semantic primary progressive aphasia and 10 with other syndromes. Longitudinal imaging allowed the delineation of progression trajectories. At post‐mortem examination, the pathognomonic feature of TDP‐C consisted of long, thick neurites found predominantly in superficial cortical layers. These neurites may represent dystrophic apical dendrites of layer III and V pyramidal neurons that are known to play pivotal roles in complex cortical computations. Other types of frontotemporal lobar degeneration TDP, such as TDP‐A and TDP‐B, are not associated with long dystrophic neurites in the cerebral cortex, and do not show similar predilection patterns for ATL. Research is beginning to identify molecular, structural, and immunological differences between pathological TDP‐43 in TDP‐C versus TDP‐A and B. Parallel investigations based on proteomics, somatic mutations, and genome‐wide association studies are detecting molecular features that could conceivably mediate the selective vulnerability of ATL to TDP‐C. Future work will focus on characterizing the distinctive features of the abnormal TDP‐C neurites, the mechanisms of neurotoxicity, initial cellular targets within the ATL, trajectory of spread, and the nature of ATL‐specific markers that modulate vulnerability to TDP‐C. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:1–12
Funding Information
  • National Institute on Aging (AG013854, AG062566, AG077444, AG072977)

This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit: