Maintenance bevacizumab–pemetrexed after first-line cisplatin–pemetrexed–bevacizumab for advanced nonsquamous nonsmall-cell lung cancer: updated survival analysis of the AVAPERL (MO22089) randomized phase III trial
Open Access
- 27 February 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 25 (5) , 1044-1052
Abstract
The randomized, phase III AVAPERL trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab maintenance with or without pemetrexed in nonsquamous nonsmall-cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged with bevacizumab–pemetrexed, but overall survival (OS) data were immature. In this article, we report an independent, updated analysis of survival outcomes in AVAPERL. Patients with advanced nsNSCLC received first-line bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg), cisplatin (75 mg/m2), and pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) every 3 weeks (q3w) for four cycles. Nonprogressing patients were randomized to maintenance bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg) or bevacizumab–pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) q3w until progression or consent withdrawal. The primary end point of the trial was PFS; in this independent OS analysis, participating study centers were contacted to collect survival data on patients still alive at the time of the first analysis. A total of 376 patients received induction treatment. Disease control was confirmed in 71.9% of patients; 253 patients were randomized to maintenance treatment with bevacizumab (n = 125) or bevacizumab–pemetrexed (n = 128). At a median follow-up of 14.8 months, patients allocated to bevacizumab–pemetrexed had significantly improved PFS versus those on bevacizumab when measured from randomization [7.4 versus 3.7 months, hazard ratio (HR), 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44–0.75); P < 0.0001]. OS events occurred in 58% of all patients. OS was numerically longer with bevacizumab–pemetrexed versus bevacizumab when measured from randomization [17.1 versus 13.2 months, HR 0.87 (0.63–1.21); P = 0.29]. Second-line therapy was administered in 77% and 70% of patients in the bevacizumab and bevacizumab–pemetrexed arms, respectively. No new adverse events were reported during this updated analysis. In an unselected population of nsNSCLC patients achieving disease control on platinum-based induction therapy, maintenance with bevacizumab–pemetrexed was associated with a nonsignificant increase in OS over bevacizumab alone.Keywords
Funding Information
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd (NCT00961415)
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- First-line bevacizumab, cisplatin and vinorelbine plus maintenance bevacizumab in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer chemo-naïve patientsExpert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 2012
- Overall survival with cisplatin–gemcitabine and bevacizumab or placebo as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomised phase III trial (AVAiL)Annals of Oncology, 2010
- Phase II Study of Pemetrexed and Carboplatin Plus Bevacizumab With Maintenance Pemetrexed and Bevacizumab As First-Line Therapy for Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- The EML4‐ALK fusion gene is involved in various histologic types of lung cancers from nonsmokers with wild‐type EGFR and KRASCancer, 2009
- Phase III Trial of Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine With Either Placebo or Bevacizumab As First-Line Therapy for Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: AVAiLJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Phase III Study Comparing Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine With Cisplatin Plus Pemetrexed in Chemotherapy-Naive Patients With Advanced-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- National survey of non-small cell lung cancer in the United States: Epidemiology, pathology and patterns of careLung Cancer, 2007
- Paclitaxel–Carboplatin Alone or with Bevacizumab for Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations and Gene Amplification in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Molecular Analysis of the IDEAL/INTACT Gefitinib TrialsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Comparison of Four Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002