Automated text scoring and real‐time adjustable feedback: Supporting revision of scientific arguments involving uncertainty
Authors:
Open Access
- 14 March 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Science Education
- Vol. 103 (3) , 590-622
Abstract
This paper describes HASbot, an automated text scoring and real‐time feedback system designed to support student revision of scientific arguments. Students submit open‐ended text responses to explain how their data support claims and how the limitations of their data affect the uncertainty of their explanations. HASbot automatically scores these text responses and returns the scores with feedback to students. Data were collected from 343 middle‐ and high‐school students taught by nine teachers across seven states in the United States. A mixed methods design was applied to investigate (a) how students’ utilization of HASbot impacted their development of uncertainty‐infused scientific arguments; (b) how students used feedback to revise their arguments, and (c) how the current design of HASbot supported or hindered students’ revisions. Paired sample t tests indicate that students made significant gains from pretest to posttest in uncertainty‐infused scientific argumentation, ES = 1.52 SD, p < 0.001. Linear regression analysis results indicate that students' HASbot use significantly contributed to their posttest performance on uncertainty‐infused scientific argumentation while gender, English language learner status, and prior computer experience did not. From the analysis of videos, we identified several affordances and limitations of HASbot.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (DRL‐1418019, DRL‐1220756)
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in scienceJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 2010
- Analytic Frameworks for Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Learning EnvironmentsEducational Psychology Review, 2007
- The Quality of Students' Use of Evidence in Written Scientific ExplanationsCognition and Instruction, 2005
- Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific ExplanationsJournal of the Learning Sciences, 2003
- Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science EducationStudies in Science Education, 2002
- Computer-Mediated Epistemic Dialogue: Explanation and Argumentation as Vehicles for Understanding Scientific NotionsJournal of the Learning Sciences, 2002
- Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All StudentsCognition and Instruction, 1998
- Learning With Peers: From Small Group Cooperation to Collaborative CommunitiesEducational Researcher, 1996
- Software‐Realized Scaffolding to Facilitate Programming for Science LearningInteractive Learning Environments, 1994
- THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING *Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1976