Rankings
Publications
Search Publications
Cited-by Search
Sources
Publishers
Scholars
Scholars
Top Cited Scholars
Organizations
About
Scilit
About Us
Advisory Board
Data Sources
Career
Support / Contact
User Guide
Publisher User
Search Function
Rankings Function
API Resource
Scilit Knowledge
Metrics
Scilit Recognitions
Publications Classification
Media
News
Blog
Login
Register
Home
Publications
Criticisms of Meta‐Analysis
Home
Publications
Criticisms of Meta‐Analysis
Criticisms of Meta‐Analysis
Authors:
MB
Michael Borenstein
Michael Borenstein
LH
Larry V. Hedges
Larry V. Hedges
JH
Julian P. T. Higgins
Julian P. T. Higgins
HR
Hannah R. Rothstein
Hannah R. Rothstein
Article Alert
Citation Alert
Add to Library
Cite
Download
Share
Download
Download PDF
Download
Publisher website
Google Scholar
11 March 2009
book chapter
Published by
Wiley
p.
377-387
DOI:
10.1002/9780470743386.ch43
Abstract
No abstract available
Keywords
CRITICISMS OF META-ANALYSIS
ONE NUMBER - NOT SUMMARIZING A RESEARCH FIELD
FILE DRAWER PROBLEM INVALIDATING META-ANALYSIS
MIXING APPLES AND ORANGES - SUMMARY EFFECT IGNORING POSSIBLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES ACROSS STUDIES
GARBAGE IN
GARBAGE OUT - IF META-ANALYSIS INCLUDES LOW-QUALITY STUDIES
FUNDAMENTAL ERRORS WILL BE CARRIED OVER TO META-ANALYSIS
META-ANALYSIS DISAGREEING WITH RANDOMIZED TRIALS
FOREST PLOT OF FIVE FICTIONAL STUDIES AND NEW TRIAL (HETEROGENEOUS EFFECTS)
Cited
Cited by 19 articles
Scroll to top