Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments: An Acceptable Term in the Computed Tomography Era?
Authors:
- Yasser OsmanYasser Osman
- Ahmed M. HarrazAhmed M. Harraz
- Ahmed R. El-NahasAhmed R. El-Nahas
- Bassam AwadBABassam Awad
- Naser El-TabeyNENaser El-Tabey
- Haytham ShebelHaytham Shebel
- Ahmed M. ShomaAhmed M. Shoma
- Ibrahim ErakyIEIbrahim Eraky
- Mahmoud El-KenawyMEMahmoud El-Kenawy
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the United Kingdom: Results of a Prospective Data RegistryEuropean Urology, 2012
- The Utility of Noncontrast Computed Tomography in the Prompt Diagnosis of Postoperative Complications After Percutaneous NephrolithotomyJournal of Endourology, 2012
- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Among Patients with Renal Anomalies: Patient Characteristics and Outcomes; a Subgroup Analysis of the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Global Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy StudyJournal of Endourology, 2011
- Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Medium-Term Follow-UpJournal of Endourology, 2011
- Diagnosis and Management of Postpercutaneous Nephrolithotomy Residual Stone FragmentsJournal of Endourology, 2009
- Third Prize: Contemporary Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy: 1585 Procedures in 1338 Consecutive PatientsJournal of Endourology, 2007
- Effectiveness of Noncontrast Computed Tomography in Evaluation of Residual Stones after Percutaneous NephrolithotomyJournal of Endourology, 2007
- 5-year-follow-up of Patients with Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments after Extracorporeal Shockwave LithotripsyEuropean Urology, 2005
- Classification of Surgical ComplicationsAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Post-ESWL, clinically insignificant residual stones: reality or myth?Urology, 2002