Penicillin Allergy, Really?—A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, to Explore General Practitioner Perspectives on Delabeling Potential in Primary Care
Preprint
- 19 March 2026
- preprint
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Abstract
Background: Most penicillin allergy labels are documented in early childhood and re-sult from events of low risk for allergy. In Germany, evidence-based strategies to eval-uate likelihood of a true penicillin allergy are still lacking. As general practitioner in-put is indispensable regarding required resources for an implementation of successful delabeling strategies in outpatient care, a mixed-methods study in Ba-den-Württemberg, Germany explored untapped delabeling potential and conditions for successful initiatives based on their experiences. to support preservation of penicil-lin as a treatment option and prevent resistance development. Methods: A cross-sectional convergent mixed-methods study was conducted with an online survey and semi-structured interviews. The survey link and invitation to participate in an in-terview was sent to randomly selected publicly available e-mail addresses. Survey data were analyzed descriptively. Qualitative data were analyzed inductively based on thematic analysis. Results: N=101 survey questionnaires and n=15 interviews were analyzed regarding relevance, experiences, framework conditions, and potential ap-proaches to delabeling. All participants had patients with limited recollection of the index reaction. Most participants considered delabeling a highly relevant topic in gen-eral practice. Delabeling efforts were discouraged by lack of time, expertise, and re-muneration, and uncertainty due to missing guidelines. Taking a sufficient medical history and, if necessary, subsequent testing were seen as one approach to delabeling. For a standardized approach in primary care, patient and care provider education, precise guideline recommendations, and delabeling expert teams were suggested. Conclusion: The findings mirror aspects already identified in international research. A nationwide survey with general practitioners could confirm that addressing necessary resources and systemic adjustments would support effective penicillin allergy delabel-ing in outpatient care.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Version 1, 2026-03-19, Preprints
- Published version: Antibiotics, 15 (4), 399.
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nationwide survey on penicillin allergy delabeling among German healthcare professionals: knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriersInfection, 2026
- Current practices and opportunities in antibiotic allergy delabelling: a national cross-sectional surveyClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2025
- Penicillin allergy assessment pathway versus usual clinical care for primary care patients with a penicillin allergy record in the UK (ALABAMA): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trialThe Lancet Primary Care, 2025
- Penicillinallergie - echt oder vermeintlich?MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin, 2024
- A new pathway for penicillin delabeling in NorwayWorld Allergy Organization Journal, 2023
- The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) guideline for the approach to suspected antibiotic allergyClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2023
- Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical testsSocial Science & Medicine, 2022
- Association Between Penicillin Allergy Documentation and Antibiotic UseJAMA Internal Medicine, 2020
- Evaluation and Management of Penicillin AllergyJAMA, 2019
- Parent-Reported Penicillin Allergy Symptoms in the Pediatric Emergency DepartmentAcademic Pediatrics, 2017