Evaluation Framework for Bruise Detection: Systematic ALS/White-Light Training and Skin-Tone Balancing with Deep Learning

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Accurate and consistent forensic bruise assessment is critical in ensuring positive clinical and legal outcomes for victims of violence. In this study, a framework for automated bruise detection is presented that, for the first time, integrates narrowband alternate-light-source (ALS) forensic imaging and ambient white light imaging. This evaluation framework is designed to address long-standing issues with respect to equitable performance across skin tones and lighting scenarios via a combination of novel model diagnostic strategies. In particular, skin-tone balancing during training and testing, threshold-sensitivity analysis, and embedding-similarity partitioning are employed to quantify the model robustness and deployment trade-offs that arise in forensic image analysis. Models were implemented with ImageNet-pretrained backbones and trained on a unique, multi-annotator full-consensus dataset comprising both white-light and ALS (415 nm and 450 nm) images. The protocol emphasizes three axes of operational relevance: (1) illumination composition in training (W/ALS ratio); (2) subgroup fairness via targeted balancing; and (3) model operating-point selection (confidence and IoU thresholds) informed by confidence-stability metrics and bootstrapped uncertainty estimates. Systematic W/ALS ratio sweeps indicate peak accuracy under ALS-dominant training and declining performance as the proportion of white-light images increases within the training set. Skin-tone balancing reduced failure rates for darker skin tones but increased overprediction in some demographic subgroups. Embedding-similarity and seen/unseen injury analyses demonstrate inflated generalization under image-level partitioning. Ultimately, the findings suggest that future researchers and developers should employ injury-level data partitioning and ensure a weighted balance of ALS images during training.
Funding Information
  • Office of Research Computing at George Mason University
  • National Science Foundation (1625039)
  • National Science Foundation (2018631)
  • National Institute of Justice (15PNIJ-21-GG-04145-SLFO)

This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit: