Protocol for a multi-domain scoping review to identify measures of decision-making ability in an ageing population
Authors:
- Emily H. HoEHEmily H. Ho
- Berivan EceBEBerivan Ece
- Miriam A. NovackMNMiriam A. Novack
- Sarah PilaSPSarah Pila
- Tatiana Karpouzian-RogersTKTatiana Karpouzian-Rogers
- Molly A MatherMMMolly A Mather
- Elizabeth McManus DworakEDElizabeth McManus Dworak
- Zahra HosseinianZHZahra Hosseinian
- Patricia BuckoPBPatricia Bucko
- Aaron James KaatAKAaron James Kaat
- S. Duke HanSHS. Duke Han
- Peter LichtenbergPLPeter Lichtenberg
Open Access
Abstract
Introduction Deficits in decision-making (DM) can lead to adverse outcomes across multiple domains such as financial management and medical care. By hindering such DM abilities, cognitive impairment (CI) often affects quality of life. Routine screening for CI, however, does not include systematic and comprehensive assessment of DM ability. While there are many DM measures, there is considerable heterogeneity in what constructs are measured and the populations in which they have been validated. This scoping review protocol details the proposed comprehensive examination of published literature on DM measures used in adults aged 45 years and older. Methods and analysis Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) scoping review methodology framework will guide the current scoping review. We will systematically search Embase (Elsevier), MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ebsco), Cochrane Library (Wiley), Web of Science (Clarivate) and Scopus (Elsevier) to identify the studies meeting our eligibility criteria. We will review literature published between January 2018 and November 2023. Following best practice recommendations, a two-stage study selection process will be applied. First, titles and abstracts will be independently reviewed by two reviewers based on our eligibility criteria. Second, full texts will be screened and data will be extracted only from the articles included after the full review. The results of the current scoping review will be reported in adherence to PRISMA-Scr guidelines. Ethics and dissemination This study does not require ethics approval as the scoping review methodology involves reviewing results from publicly available published materials. Results of the scoping review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number NIA grant number 1U24AG082022-01.Keywords
Funding Information
- NIA (1U24AG082022-01)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recent Advances in Neuropsychological Test Interpretation for Clinical PracticeNeuropsychology Review, 2023
- Management of Financial Assets by Older Adults With and Without Dementia or Other Cognitive ImpairmentsJAMA Network Open, 2022
- Methodological guidance for rapid reviews in healthcare: A scoping reviewResearch Synthesis Methods, 2022
- Impact of Early Life Socioeconomic Status on Decision Making in Older Adults Without DementiaArchives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 2021
- Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Older AdultsJAMA, 2020
- Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Older AdultsJAMA, 2020
- How does decisional capacity evolve with normal cognitive aging: systematic review of the literatureEuropean Geriatric Medicine, 2019
- A novel questionnaire to measure staff perception of end-of-life decision making in the intensive care unit—Development and psychometric testingJournal of Critical Care, 2015
- The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's diseaseAlzheimer's & Dementia, 2011
- When does age-related cognitive decline begin?Neurobiology of Aging, 2009