Hysteretic energy‐based state‐dependent fragility for ground‐motion sequences
Open Access
- 20 November 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
- Vol. 50 (4) , 1187-1203
Abstract
A framework to derive state‐dependent fragility relationships of structures subjected to ground‐motion sequences (e.g. mainshock‐aftershock (MS‐AS) or triggered earthquakes) is proposed. The hysteretic energy dissipated in the sequence is adopted as the main demand parameter, as it is a cumulative measure monotonically increasing with the length of the excitation. For a structure subjected to earthquake‐induced ground motions, it is not possible to define a closed‐form representation of the hysteretic energy as a function of the peak deformation. However, based on theoretical considerations, the hysteretic energy‐peak deformation trend is discussed, highlighting that (a) the significant duration of the ground motion explains the variability of the hysteretic energy for a given peak deformation; (b) the hysteretic energy dissipated in an AS decreases (for a given AS peak displacement) if the peak displacement in the MS increases. A vector‐valued probabilistic seismic demand model consistent with these considerations is proposed in the form of a surface relating the hysteretic energy in the sequence to the peak deformation in the MS and a ground‐motion intensity measure of the AS. This is calibrated via sequential cloud‐based time‐history analyses. The framework is demonstrated for 14 reinforced concrete frame buildings with different height, plastic mechanisms, and infill distributions. The results show the feasibility of the proposed approach, effectively capturing damage accumulation without inconsistencies in the obtained statistical model. The framework may be used for risk‐assessment applications explicitly incorporating ground‐motion sequences. The hysteretic energy versus peak deformation relationship may also be exploited in problems involving long‐duration ground motions or soft soils.Keywords
Funding Information
- H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (843794)
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mainshock‐consistent ground motion record selection for aftershock sequencesEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2020
- Mainshock‐aftershock state‐dependent fragility curves: A case of wood‐frame houses in British Columbia, CanadaEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2020
- Seismic fragility assessment of infilled frames subject to mainshock/aftershock sequences using a double incremental dynamic analysis approachBulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2018
- Hysteretic energy prediction method for mainshock-aftershock sequencesEarthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2018
- Incorporating low-cycle fatigue model into duration-dependent inelastic design spectraEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2004
- Cumulative damage‐based inelastic cyclic demand spectrumEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2003
- Cyclic‐demand spectrumEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2002
- Damage indices and damage measuresProgress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 2000
- Equivalent ductility factors, taking into account low‐cycle fatigueEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1992
- Evaluation of seismic energy in structuresEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1990