Decision tree for adaptation after radical changes: linking dynamic capabilities, ambidexterity, and strategic alliances
Open Access
- 23 May 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Management and Governance
- Vol. 28 (3) , 745-769
Abstract
We developed a decision tree that integrates relevant organizational adaptation theories to respond to radical changes. The understanding of organizational adaptation often requires a combination of multiple theoretical lenses, especially considering today’s radical changes in technologies, markets, and regulations. However, the research streams on adaptation and change are often disconnected and we lack a unifying adaptation framework that might reveal the synergistic contribution of each theoretical perspective to the problem. To fill this important lacuna, we integrate four relevant scholarly perspectives on the topic: dynamic capabilities, ambidexterity, vertical alliances, and horizontal strategic alliances. Our main contribution is an integrative decision tree that unveils when and why each perspective is most appropriate to respond to radical changes. Our research also unpacks dynamic capabilities theory by suggesting when ambidexterity, vertical, and horizontal alliances are appropriate to integrate the upper-level theory of dynamic capabilities, and how they can overcome some of its limitations. The paper also clarifies that, in order to adapt ambidextrously after radical changes destroying core and/or complementary assets, companies need specific alliance strategies.Keywords
Funding Information
- University College Dublin
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stock of downstream complementary assets as a catalyst for product innovation during technological change in the U.S. machine tool industryStrategic Management Journal, 2016
- The elephant in the room of dynamic capabilities: Bringing two diverging conversations togetherStrategic Management Journal, 2013
- Customer preference discontinuities: a trigger for radical technological changeManagerial and Decision Economics, 2007
- Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperationStrategic Management Journal, 2001
- Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creationStrategic Management Journal, 2001
- Dynamic capabilities: what are they?Strategic Management Journal, 2000
- Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imagingStrategic Management Journal, 2000
- Dynamic capabilities and strategic managementStrategic Management Journal, 1997
- UNRAVELING THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION: COMPLEMENTARY ASSETS AND INCUMBENT SURVIVAL IN THE TYPESETTER INDUSTRYStrategic Management Journal, 1997
- CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMSStrategic Management Journal, 1996