THROMBOTECT – a randomized study comparing low molecular weight heparin, antithrombin and unfractionated heparin for thromboprophylaxis during induction therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and adolescents
Open Access
- 27 September 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ferrata Storti Foundation (Haematologica) in Haematologica
- Vol. 104 (4) , 756-765
Abstract
Thromboembolism is a serious complication of induction therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. We prospectively compared efficacy and safety of antithrombotic interventions in the consecutive leukemia trials ALL-BFM 2000 and AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009. Patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=949, age 1 to 18 years) were randomized to receive low-dose unfractionated heparin, prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) or activity-adapted antithrombin throughout induction therapy. Primary objective was to test whether enoxaparin or antithrombin reduce the incidence of thromboembolism as compared to unfractionated heparin. Principal safety outcome was hemorrhage; leukemia outcome was a secondary endpoint. Thromboembolism occurred in 42 patients (4.4%). Patients assigned to unfractionated heparin had a higher risk of thromboembolism (8.0%) compared with those randomized to enoxaparin (3.5%; P=0.011) or antithrombin (1.9%; P<0.001). The proportion of patients who refused antithrombotic treatment as allocated was 3% in the unfractionated heparin or antithrombin, and 33% in the enoxaparin arm. Major hemorrhage occurred in eight patients (no differences between the groups). 5-year-event free survival was 80.9±2.2% if assigned to antithrombin compared to 85.9±2.0% in the unfractionated heparin (P=0.06), and 86.2±2.0% in the enoxaparin group (P=0.10). In conclusion, prophylactic use of antithrombin or enoxaparin significantly reduced thromboembolism. Despite the considerable number of patients rejecting the assigned treatment with subcutaneous injections, the result remains nonambiguous. Thromboprophylaxis - for the present time primarily with enoxaparin - can be recommended for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia during induction therapy. Whether and how antithrombin may affect leukemia outcome remains to be determined.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Personal practice: How we manage the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in children and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemiaBritish Journal of Haematology, 2011
- Prophylactic therapy with enoxaparin in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and inherited thrombophilia during L-asparaginase treatmentThrombosis Research, 2010
- Comparison of low‐molecular‐weight heparin and antithrombin versus antithrombin alone for the prevention of symptomatic venous thromboembolism in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemiaPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2007
- THROMBOTIC EFFECTS OF ASPARAGINASE IN TWO ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA PROTOCOLS (NOPHO ALL-1992 VERSUS NOPHO ALL-2000): A Single-Institution StudyPediatric Hematology and Oncology, 2006
- Thrombosis in Infants and ChildrenHematology-American Society Hematology Education Program, 2006
- Central venous line–related thrombosis in children: association with central venous line location and insertion techniqueBlood, 2003
- Trend to efficacy and safety using antithrombin concentrate in prevention of thrombosis in children receiving l-asparaginase for acute lymphoblastic leukemiaThrombosis and Haemostasis, 2003
- Low-molecular-weight heparin in pediatric patients with thrombotic disease: A dose finding studyThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1996
- Hemostasis in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Coagulopathy Induced by Disease and TreatmentSeminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 1995
- Hypercoagulability during l‐asparaginase treatment: the effect of antithrombin III supplementation in vivoBritish Journal of Haematology, 1990