Should medical students be selected only from recent school‐leavers who have studied science?

Authors:
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Summary. This study was undertaken to investigate the apparently widespread belief that in order to be successful at medical school, aspiring candidates must have a sound academic background based predominantly on the study of the natural sciences, be school‐leavers aged about 18 (in the non‐college educational environments such as Australia or the United Kingdom) and preferably be men. The demographic background and prior academic achievement of individual students entering the University of Newcastle Medical School between 1978 and 1989 has been reviewed and compared with their progress in medical studies. The data show that in the Newcastle medical school environment there is no significant correlation between outcome and previous study of any of the natural sciences. However, significant correlations between outcome and performance in the humanities in general, and English in particular, were found. In this regard a weak background in these subjects correlated with an increased tendency not to complete the medical course. There were no significant correlations found between outcome and age at entry, sex or levels of prior academic achievement (within the top 10% achievement band studied). In summary, the study offers no support for the current selection criteria dominating medical school admissions processes.

This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit: