Alpha Values as a Function of Sample Size, Effect Size, and Power: Accuracy over Inference
Authors:
- 1 June 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 112 (3) , 835-44
Abstract
Tables of alpha values as a function of sample size, effect size, and desired power were presented. The tables indicated expected alphas for small, medium, and large effect sizes given a variety of sample sizes. It was evident that sample sizes for most psychological studies are adequate for large effect sizes defined at .8. The typical alpha level of .05 and desired power of 90% can be achieved with 70 participants in two groups. It was perhaps doubtful if these ideal levels of alpha and power have generally been achieved for medium effect sizes in actual research, since 170 participants would be required. Small effect sizes have rarely been tested with an adequate number of participants or power. Implications were discussed.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalsePLOS Medicine, 2005
- Testing Fisher, Neyman, Pearson, and BayesThe American Statistician, 2005
- The Persistence of Underpowered Studies in Psychological Research: Causes, Consequences, and Remedies.Psychological Methods, 2004
- One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively DescribedReview of General Psychology, 2003
- Statistical power of articles published in three health-psychology related journals.Health Psychology, 2001
- Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.American Psychologist, 1999
- Estimating the Effect of the File Drawer Problem in Meta-AnalysisPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1997
- The earth is round (p < .05).American Psychologist, 1994
- The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis.American Psychologist, 1993
- The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962