Short- and Long-term Outcomes After Lung Transplantation From Circulatory-Dead Donors
Authors:
- An MartensAMAn Martens
- Sofie OrdiesSOSofie Ordies
- Stijn E. VerledenSVStijn E. Verleden
- Arne P. NeyrinckANArne P. Neyrinck
- Robin VosRVRobin Vos
- Marc Collado BoadaMBMarc Collado Boada
- Bart M. VanaudenaerdeBVBart M. Vanaudenaerde
- Geert M. VerledenGVGeert M. Verleden
- Dirk Van RaemdonckDRDirk Van Raemdonck
- 1 November 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 101 (11) , 2691-2694
Abstract
Donation after cardiac death (DCD) to overcome the donor organ shortage is well accepted in the clinical setting, although long-term outcome after DCD lung transplantation (LTx) remains largely unknown. In this retrospective study, DCD LTx recipients (n = 59) were compared with a cohort of donation after brain death (DBD) LTx recipients (n = 331) transplanted between February 2007 and September 2013; follow-up was until January 1, 2016. Short-term (duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, and highest primary graft dysfunction score within 72 hours) and long-term (chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free and overall survival) follow-up were compared over a median follow-up of 50.5 (±3.7) months for DCD and 66.8 (±1.5) months for DBD. There were no differences between groups with regard to patient characteristics: age (P = 0.78), underlying disease (P = 0.30) and type of type of LTx (P = 0.10), except sex where more males were transplanted with a DCD donor (62.7%) vs (48.3%, P = 0.048). There was no difference in time on mechanical ventilation (P = 0.59), intensive care unit stay (P = 0.74), highest primary graft dysfunction score (P = 0.67) and hospital stay (P = 0.99). Moreover, chronic lung allograft dysfunction–free (P = 0.86) and overall survival (P = 0.15) did not differ between the DBD and DCD groups. In our experience, both short- and long-term outcomes in DCD lung recipients are comparable to that of DBD lung recipients. Therefore, DCD LTx can be considered a safe strategy that significantly increased our transplant activity.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accepting donor lungs for transplant: let Lisa and Bob finish the job!European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2016
- International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Donation After Circulatory Death Registry ReportThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2015
- Lung transplantation from donation after cardiocirculatory death: a systematic review and meta-analysisThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2015
- Current views on chronic rejection after lung transplantationTransplant International, 2015
- A decade of extended-criteria lung donors in a single center: was it justified?Transplant International, 2014
- Medium-term outcome after lung transplantation is comparable between brain-dead and cardiac-dead donorsThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2011
- Donor selection and managementCurrent Opinion in Organ Transplantation, 2009
- Early Outcome After Lung Transplantation From Non–Heart-Beating Donors is Comparable to Heart-Beating DonorsThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2009
- Lung Donor Selection and ManagementProceedings of the American Thoracic Society, 2009
- A review of lung transplant donor acceptability criteriaThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2003