Solid waste management program in developing countries: contingent valuation methodology versus choice experiment
Authors:
- 4 August 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Environment, Development and Sustainability
- Vol. 25 (11) , 12395-12417
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Can Tho University Improvement Project (VN14-P6)
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding the normalisation of recycling behaviour and its implications for other pro-environmental behaviours: A review of social norms and recyclingResources, Conservation and Recycling, 2013
- Determinants of households’ willingness-to-pay for private solid waste management services in Ibadan, NigeriaWaste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, 2009
- A choice experiment of the residential preference of waste management services – The example of Kagoshima city, JapanWaste Management, 2007
- Comparison of contingent valuation and choice experiment in solid waste management programs in MacaoEcological Economics, 2006
- Comparison of contingent valuation and conjoint analysis in ecosystem managementEcological Economics, 2000
- Valuing improved wetland quality using choice modelingWater Resources Research, 1999
- Habit, Attitude, and Planned Behaviour: Is Habit an Empty Construct or an Interesting Case of Goal-directed Automaticity?European Review of Social Psychology, 1999
- A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuationEcological Economics, 1996
- Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994
- A law of comparative judgment.Psychological Review, 1927