Communication Barriers and Facilitators to Specialist Pediatric Palliative Care Involvement in Pediatric Oncology Settings Across Canada
Authors:
- Leeat GranekLGLeeat Granek
- Stephanie Veldhuijzen van ZantenSZStephanie Veldhuijzen van Zanten
- Kimberley WidgerKWKimberley Widger
- Lori WienerLWLori Wiener
- Donna JohnstonDJDonna Johnston
- Fyeza HasanFHFyeza Hasan
- Anthony K. C. ChanACAnthony K. C. Chan
- Dave LyseckiDLDave Lysecki
- Emily McCulloghEMEmily McCullogh
Open Access
- 7 August 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Psycho-Oncology
- Vol. 35 (8) , e70568
Abstract
Objectives: To examine how healthcare provider communication shapes referral, acceptance and ongoing integration of specialist pediatric palliative care (SPPC). Methods: A qualitative study was conducted across four pediatric cancer centers in Canada. Sixty‐six healthcare providers working in oncology and palliative care settings participated in in‐depth interviews. Participants included physicians, nurses, psycho‐social clinicians and other members of the interprofessional health team. Transcripts were analyzed using iterative, inductive coding based on the Grounded Theory method. Results: Communication barriers to referral and acceptance included inadequate explanations for SPPC involvement, incomplete or misleading descriptions of services, and framing SPPC solely as end‐of‐life care. Oncologist discomfort, avoidance, and use of ambiguous “coded” language further hindered referral conversations. Facilitators included strong communication skills, clear and comprehensive explanations of SPPC, and age‐appropriate engagement with patients. For ongoing integration of SPPC, poor interprofessional communication and unclear role and responsibilities among team members created risks for fragmented care. In contrast, structured collaboration such as joint meetings, shared care planning, and proactive information exchange, supported effective integration of SPPC and consistent messaging to patients and families. Conclusions: Communication is central to successful SPPC referral, acceptance, and integration in pediatric oncology settings. Both clinician‐family and interprofessional communication practices directly shaped understanding and engagement with SPPC services. Interventions should prioritize communication training, clearer framing of SPPC, and enhanced collaboration between teams. Early involvement of the psychosocial provider along with an SPPC specialist may further improve communication and uptake, ultimately strengthening care for children with serious illness and their families.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perceptions of specialty palliative care and its role in pediatric stem cell transplant: A multidisciplinary qualitative studyPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2021
- Contribution of unequal new patient referrals to female surgeon under-employmentThe American Journal of Surgery, 2021
- The Impact of Specialty Palliative Care in Pediatric Oncology: A Systematic ReviewJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2021
- Barriers to the early integration of palliative care in pediatric oncology in 11 Eurasian countriesCancer, 2020
- Initiating Palliative Care Referrals in Pediatric OncologyJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2020
- Predictors of Late Palliative Care Referral in Children With CancerJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2018
- Barriers to accessing palliative care for pediatric patients with cancer: A review of the literatureCancer, 2018
- Association Between Palliative Care and Patient and Caregiver OutcomesJAMA, 2016
- Medical oncologists' perception of palliative care programs and the impact of name change to supportive care on communication with patients during the referral process. A qualitative studyPalliative and Supportive Care, 2013
- An assessment of the current state of palliative care education in pediatric hematology/oncology fellowship trainingPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2009