The Role of ATM in the Deficiency in Nonhomologous End-Joining near Telomeres in a Human Cancer Cell Line
Authors:
Open Access
- 28 March 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS Genetics
- Vol. 9 (3) , e1003386
Abstract
Telomeres distinguish chromosome ends from double-strand breaks (DSBs) and prevent chromosome fusion. However, telomeres can also interfere with DNA repair, as shown by a deficiency in nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and an increase in large deletions at telomeric DSBs. The sensitivity of telomeric regions to DSBs is important in the cellular response to ionizing radiation and oncogene-induced replication stress, either by preventing cell division in normal cells, or by promoting chromosome instability in cancer cells. We have previously proposed that the telomeric protein TRF2 causes the sensitivity of telomeric regions to DSBs, either through its inhibition of ATM, or by promoting the processing of DSBs as though they are telomeres, which is independent of ATM. Our current study addresses the mechanism responsible for the deficiency in repair of DSBs near telomeres by combining assays for large deletions, NHEJ, small deletions, and gross chromosome rearrangements (GCRs) to compare the types of events resulting from DSBs at interstitial and telomeric DSBs. Our results confirm the sensitivity of telomeric regions to DSBs by demonstrating that the frequency of GCRs is greatly increased at DSBs near telomeres and that the role of ATM in DSB repair is very different at interstitial and telomeric DSBs. Unlike at interstitial DSBs, a deficiency in ATM decreases NHEJ and small deletions at telomeric DSBs, while it increases large deletions. These results strongly suggest that ATM is functional near telomeres and is involved in end protection at telomeric DSBs, but is not required for the extensive resection at telomeric DSBs. The results support our model in which the deficiency in DSB repair near telomeres is a result of ATM-independent processing of DSBs as though they are telomeres, leading to extensive resection, telomere loss, and GCRs involving alternative NHEJ. The ends of chromosomes, called telomeres, prevent chromosome ends from appearing as DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and prevent chromosome fusion by forming a specialized nucleo-protein complex. The critical function of telomeres in end protection has a downside, in that it interferes with the repair of DSBs that occur near telomeres. DSBs are critical DNA lesions, because if they are not repaired correctly they can result in gross chromosome rearrangements (GCRs). As a result, the deficiency in DSB repair near telomeres has now been implicated in ageing, by promoting cell senescence, and cancer, by promoting telomere dysfunction due to oncogene-induced replication stress. The studies presented here demonstrate that DSBs near telomeres commonly result in GCRs in a human tumor cell line. Moreover, our results demonstrate that the mechanism of repair of telomeric DSBs is very different from the mechanism of repair of DSBs at other locations, supporting our hypothesis that the deficiency in repair of DSBs near telomeres is a result of the abnormal processing of DSBs due to the presence of telomeric proteins. Understanding the mechanism responsible for the deficiency in DSB repair near telomeres will provide important insights into critical human disease pathways.Keywords
This publication has 104 references indexed in Scilit:
- Oncogene‐induced telomere dysfunction enforces cellular senescence in human cancer precursor lesionsThe EMBO Journal, 2012
- Telomeres are favoured targets of a persistent DNA damage response in ageing and stress-induced senescenceNature Communications, 2012
- Double-Strand Breaks in Heterochromatin Move Outside of a Dynamic HP1a Domain to Complete Recombinational RepairCell, 2011
- ATM Limits Incorrect End Utilization during Non-Homologous End Joining of Multiple Chromosome BreaksPLOS Genetics, 2010
- Limiting the Persistence of a Chromosome Break Diminishes Its Mutagenic PotentialPLOS Genetics, 2009
- Defects in XRCC4 and KU80 differentially affect the joining of distal nonhomologous endsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- ATM and the Mre11 complex combine to recognize and signal DNA double-strand breaksOncogene, 2007
- A new genomic mechanism leading to cri‐du‐chat syndromeAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2006
- Telomeres and chromosome instabilityDNA Repair, 2006
- Four new cases of inverted terminal duplication: A modified hypothesis of mechanism of originAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1995