Education, markets, and an audit culture
Author:
- Michael W. AppleMAMichael W. Apple
- 10 June 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Critical Quarterly
- Vol. 47 (1-2) , 11-29
Abstract
In this article I discuss some of the ways in which certain elements of conservative modernisation have had an impact on higher education and education in general. I point to the growth of commodifying logics and the audit culture that accompanies them. In the process, I highlight a number of dangers that we currently face. However, I also urge us not to assume that these conditions can be reduced to the automatic workings out of simple formulas. We need a much more nuanced and complex picture of class relations and class projects to understand what is happening. Finally, I point to the importance of not simply defending existing institutions, since there may be elements of good sense as well as bad sense in the neo‐liberal and neo‐conservative criticisms. The issue is not whether or not we need accountability, but the kinds of logics of accountability, and the question of accountability to whom, that tend now to guide the process of higher education. An alternative to the external imposition of targets, performance criteria and quantifiable outcomes ‐ but one that still takes the issue of public accountability seriously ‐ can be built. I point to some criteria that can be used to judge it.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Public accountability in the age of neo‐liberal governanceJournal of Education Policy, 2003
- Re-thinking trust in a performative culture: the case of educationJournal of Education Policy, 2003
- "We Are Not What We Seem": Rethinking Black Working-Class Opposition in the Jim Crow SouthJournal of American History, 1993