COMORBIDITY AND DISEASE BURDEN IN THE NATIONAL COMORBIDITY SURVEY REPLICATION (NCS-R)
- 14 May 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Hindawi Limited in Depression and Anxiety
- Vol. 29 (9) , 797-806
Abstract
Background Disease burden estimates rarely consider comorbidity. Using a recently developed methodology for integrating information about comorbidity into disease burden estimates, we examined the comparative burdens of nine mental and 10 chronic physical disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS‐R). Methods Face‐to‐face interviews in a national household sample (n = 5,692) assessed associations of disorders with scores on a visual analog scale (VAS) of perceived health. Multiple regression analysis with interactions for comorbidity was used to estimate these associations. Simulation was used to estimate incremental disorder‐specific effects adjusting for comorbidity. Results The majority of respondents (74.9%) reported one or more disorders. Of respondents with disorders, 73.8–98.2% reported having at least one other disorder. The best‐fitting model to predict VAS scores included disorder main effects and interactions for number of disorders. Adjustment for comorbidity reduced individual‐level disorder‐specific burden estimates substantially, but with considerable between‐disorder variation (0.07–0.69 ratios of disorder‐specific estimates with and without adjustment for comorbidity). Four of the five most burdensome disorders at the individual level were mental disorders based on bivariate analyses (panic/agoraphobia, bipolar disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, major depression) but only two based on multivariate analyses, adjusting for comorbidity (panic/agoraphobia, major depression). Neurological disorders, chronic pain conditions, and diabetes were the other most burdensome individual‐level disorders. Chronic pain conditions, cardiovascular disorders, arthritis, insomnia, and major depression were the most burdensome societal‐level disorders. Conclusions Adjustments for comorbidity substantially influence estimates of disease burden, especially those of mental disorders, underlining the importance of including information about comorbidity in studies of mental disorders.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Including information about co-morbidity in estimates of disease burden: results from the World Health Organization World Mental Health SurveysPsychological Medicine, 2010
- Modeling Ranking, Time Trade-Off, and Visual Analog Scale Values for EQ-5D Health StatesMedical Care, 2009
- Disability and treatment of specific mental and physical disorders across the worldThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2008
- Thurstone Scaling as a Measurement Method to Quantify Subjective Health OutcomesMedical Care, 2008
- Multimorbidity's many challengesBMJ, 2007
- Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost‐utility analysis?Health Economics, 2006
- Prevalence of Multimorbidity Among Adults Seen in Family PracticeThe Annals of Family Medicine, 2005
- What Do Self-Reported, Objective, Measures of Health Measure?The Journal of Human Resources, 2004
- The Effects of Chronic Medical Conditions on Work Loss and Work CutbackJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2001
- Association of Comorbidity with Disability in Older WomenJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1999