Species-specific versus community-wide assays in eDNA monitoring of the European eel Anguilla anguilla : Trade-offs between detection sensitivity and the value of additional community data
Authors:
- Angus I.T. MonaghanAMAngus I.T. Monaghan
- Graham S. SellersGSGraham S. Sellers
- Nathan P. GriffithsNGNathan P. Griffiths
- Lori Lawson HandleyLHLori Lawson Handley
- Bernd HänflingBHBernd Hänfling
- James A. MacarthurJMJames A. Macarthur
- Rosalind M. WrightRWRosalind M. Wright
- Jonathan D. BollandJBJonathan D. Bolland
Preprint
Abstract
Effective monitoring of the critically endangered European eel ( Anguilla anguilla ) is essential for conservation planning and regulatory decision-making, particularly in heavily fragmented rivers. Environmental DNA (eDNA) methods offer sensitive alternatives to traditional surveys, but there is uncertainty around whether targeted assays or community-wide approaches are better suited to achieve monitoring objectives. We compared eDNA metabarcoding and species-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) for detecting A. anguilla across 145 pumped catchments in the Fens, East Anglia, England. All sites were sampled once initially, and sites negative for A. anguilla were re-sampled based on metabarcoding results. This allowed comparison of detection rates from a single water sample and site-level retrospective identification of sites where qPCR could have identified A. anguilla in earlier samples. The findings were also set in the context of the wider biodiversity information generated by metabarcoding. From the initial (single) water sample, qPCR detected A. anguilla at seven more sites than metabarcoding (17 versus 10). With repeated sampling, metabarcoding detected A. anguilla at 43 sites, including all but one of the sites where qPCR detected A. anguilla , and ten sites where qPCR did not detect A. anguilla within the same number of samples. Indeed, the additional sampling effort required to detect A. anguilla with metabarcoding at sites also positive with qPCR was small relative to the overall sampling effort. Furthermore, metabarcoding additionally detected 28 non-target fish species alongside fish, amphibian and mammal species of conservation concern. Our results highlight trade-offs between target-species sensitivity and the broader ecological information provided by each method, and support metabarcoding as an effective tool for a holistic conservation approach, with the additional community data outweighing the marginally increased sensitivity of qPCR.Keywords
Funding Information
- Environment Agency
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of qPCR and metabarcoding for environmental DNA surveillance of a freshwater parasiteEcology and Evolution, 2024
- Integrating environmental DNA monitoring to inform eel (Anguilla anguilla) status in freshwaters at their easternmost range—A case study in CyprusEcology and Evolution, 2023
- Catchment‐scale distribution, abundance, habitat use, and movements of European eel (Anguilla anguilla L.) in a small UK river: Implications for conservation managementAquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 2022
- Better boundaries: identifying the upper extent of fish distributions in forested streams using eDNA and electrofishingEcosphere, 2021
- Improved freshwater macroinvertebrate detection from environmental DNA through minimized nontarget amplificationEnvironmental DNA, 2020
- Targeted and passive environmental DNA approaches outperform established methods for detection of quagga mussels, Dreissena rostriformis bugensis in flowing waterEcology and Evolution, 2020
- Temporal and spatial variation in distribution of fish environmental DNA in England’s largest lakeEnvironmental DNA, 2019
- Needle in a haystack? A comparison ofeDNAmetabarcoding and targetedqPCRfor detection of the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus)Ecology and Evolution, 2018
- Temporal and spatial variations in the abundance and population structure of the spined loach (Cobitis taenia), a scarce fish species: implications for condition assessment and conservationAquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 2014
- Improved Protocols for the Illumina Genome Analyzer Sequencing SystemCurrent Protocols in Human Genetics, 2009