The role of the stress regime on microseismicity induced by overpressure and cooling in geologic carbon storage
Author:
Abstract
Fluid injection in deep geological formations usually induces microseismicity. In particular, industrial‐scale injection of CO2 may induce a large number of microseismic events. Since CO2 is likely to reach the storage formation at a lower temperature than that corresponding to the geothermal gradient, both overpressure and cooling decrease the effective stresses and may induce microseismicity. Here, we investigate the effect of the stress regime on the effective stress evolution and fracture stability when injecting cold CO2 through a horizontal well in a deep saline formation. Simulation results show that when only overpressure occurs, the vertical total stress remains practically constant, but the horizontal total stresses increase proportionally to overpressure. These hydro‐mechanical stress changes result in a slight improvement in fracture stability in normal faulting stress regimes because the decrease in deviatoric stress offsets the decrease in effective stresses produced by overpressure. However, fracture stability significantly decreases in reverse faulting stress regimes because the size of the Mohr circle increases in addition to being displaced towards failure conditions. Fracture stability also decreases in strike slip stress regimes because the Mohr circle maintains its size and is shifted towards the yield surface a magnitude equal to overpressure minus the increase in the horizontal total stresses. Additionally, cooling induces a thermal stress reduction in all directions, but larger in the out‐of‐plane direction. This stress anisotropy causes, apart from a displacement of the Mohr circle towards the yield surface, an increase in the size of the Mohr circle. These two effects decrease fracture stability, resulting in the strike slip being the least stable stress regime when cooling occurs, followed by the reverse faulting and the normal faulting stress regimes. Thus, characterizing the stress state is crucial to determine the maximum sustainable injection pressure and maximum temperature drop to safely inject CO2.Keywords
Funding Information
- Seventh Framework Programme (291771)
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- No geologic evidence that seismicity causes fault leakage that would render large-scale carbon capture and storage unsuccessfulProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012
- Geomechanical modeling for CO2 storage in Nisku aquifer in Wabamun Lake area in CanadaInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2012
- Earthquake triggering and large-scale geologic storage of carbon dioxideProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012
- A survey of the induced seismic responses to fluid injection in geothermal and CO2 reservoirs in EuropeGeothermics, 2012
- Impact of CO2geological sequestration on the nucleation of earthquakesGeophysical Research Letters, 2011
- Linking microseismic event observations with geomechanical models to minimise the risks of storing CO2 in geological formationsEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 2011
- Coupled reservoir-geomechanical analysis of CO2 injection and ground deformations at In Salah, AlgeriaInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2010
- Characterisation of Gas Transport Properties of the Opalinus Clay, a Potential Host Rock Formation for Radioactive Waste DisposalOil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles, 2005
- A note on induced stress changes in hydrocarbon and geothermal reservoirsTectonophysics, 1998
- Numerical formulation for a simulator (CODE_BRIGHT) for the coupled analysis of saline mediaEngineering Computations, 1996