Preferences of Men Who Have Sex With Men Toward the Distribution of HIV Self-Test Kits Through Social Networks: A Discrete Choice Experiment
- 1 September 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
- Vol. 100 (1) , 39-48
Abstract
Objective: Social network distribution of HIV self-test (HIVST) kits uses social networks to increase HIV testing among marginalized populations, such as men who have sex with men (MSM). Using a discrete choice experiment, we identified factors influencing MSM's willingness and decision making in HIVST kit distribution. Design: An online discrete choice experiment survey was conducted among MSM in Australia (December 2023−May 2024) through online/offline advertisements. Methods: Participants completed 7 choice sets, each containing 2 hypothetical scenarios for HIVST kits distribution described by attributes such as cost, location, training, support system, and self-reporting methods. Mixed logit models and latent class analysis explored preference heterogeneity across language (English vs. non-English first language) and nativity (Australian-born vs. overseas-born) groups. Results: There were 251 participants, including 140 overseas-born MSM, with a mean age of 36.5 years (SD = 11.9). Participants who did not speak English as their first language (29/251, 12%) showed a lower preference for paid HIVST kits ($30 or $60 for 3 kits) and online video chats with sexual health professionals as pretest support. Overseas-born participants preferred not to attend 30-minute or 1-hour training sessions on distributing HIVST kits. They did not like accessing HIVST kits from hospitals. Class 1 (‘Cost-conscious and minimal support seekers’; 61.7%) were willing to pay up to $30 for 3 kits, while Class 2 (‘Subsidy-dependent and structured support seekers’; 38.3%) disliked costs and self-reporting results by phone. Conclusions: Increasing participation in social network distribution of HIVST kits will require free or subsidized kits. Tailored support systems should prioritize overseas-born MSM with limited English proficiency.Keywords
Funding Information
- Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1193955)
- Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1172873)
- Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1172900)
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prediction accuracy of discrete choice experiments in health-related research: a systematic review and meta-analysiseClinicalMedicine, 2024
- Linkage to care and prevention after HIV self‐testing: a systematic review and meta‐analysisJournal of the International AIDS Society, 2024
- Preferences for pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV: A systematic review of discrete choice experimentseClinicalMedicine, 2022
- HIV self-testing with digital supports as the new paradigm: A systematic review of global evidence (2010–2021)eClinicalMedicine, 2021
- Designing HIV Testing and Self-Testing Services for Young People in Nigeria: A Discrete Choice ExperimentThe Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2021
- Heterogeneity in individual preferences for HIV testing: A systematic literature review of discrete choice experimentseClinicalMedicine, 2020
- Exploring Relative Preferences for HIV Service Features Using Discrete Choice Experiments: a Synthetic ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS Reports, 2020
- Acceptability, perceived reliability and challenges associated with distributing HIV self‐test kits to young MSM in Uganda: a qualitative studyJournal of the International AIDS Society, 2019
- Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and FuturePharmacoEconomics, 2018
- Gay and Bisexual Men’s Views on Rapid Self-Testing for HIVAIDS and Behavior, 2013