Managing an impacted fetal head at caesarean section: a UK survey of healthcare professionals and parents
Authors:
Open Access
- 7 February 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Vol. 271, 88-92
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Determinants and Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Section following Failed Instrumental Delivery: 5-Year Observational Review at a Tertiary Referral Centre in LondonJournal of Pregnancy, 2015
- Second Stage Caesarean Section: Evaluation of Patwardhan TechniqueJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 2014
- A meta-analysis of reverse breech extraction to deliver a deeply impacted head during cesarean deliveryInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2013
- Comparison of “push” and “pull” methods for impacted fetal head extraction during cesarean deliveryInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2012
- Rising rates of caesarean deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a concerning trendEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2011
- Delivery of the deeply engaged head: a lacuna in trainingJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2010
- Changing trends in operative delivery performed at full dilatation over a 10-year periodJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2010
- Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during Cesarean sectionEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2005
- Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labourBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2005
- Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2004