A Diffusion Model Analysis of Object-Based Selective Attention in the Eriksen Flanker Task
Open Access
- 1 May 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Hogrefe Publishing Group in Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 70 (3) , 155-170
Abstract
Selective attention might be space-, feature-, and/or object-based. Clear support for the involvement of an object-based mechanism is rather scarce, possibly because the predictions of models from these different classes often overlap. Yet, only object-based models can account for a larger congruency effect (CE) in the Eriksen flanker task when flankers are more (vs. less) strongly grouped to the target, but spacing and other response-irrelevant features of target and flankers are held constant. Exactly this was observed by Kramer and Jacobson (1991) . So far, this theoretically relevant finding has not been replicated closely. We replicated the finding in two web-based experiments. Specifically, CEs were larger when flanker lines were connected to the central target line (vs. to outer neutral lines). We also successfully fitted the Diffusion Model for Conflict tasks (DMC) to the experimental data. Critically, diffusion modeling (DMC) and distributional analyses (delta functions) revealed that object membership primarily affected target processing strength rather than strength or timing of flanker processing. This challenges the prominent attentional spreading (sensory enhancement) account of object-based selective attention and motivates an alternative target attenuation account.Keywords
This publication has 73 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diffusion models of the flanker task: Discrete versus gradual attentional selectionCognitive Psychology, 2011
- Modulation of Focused Attention by Faces Expressing Emotion: Evidence From Flanker Tasks.Emotion, 2003
- Object-based attention: Sensory modulation or priority setting?Perception & Psychophysics, 2002
- Attentional scanning in the selection of central targets from multi-symbol stringsVisual Cognition, 1995
- Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulusesponse correspondence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1994
- Does motion-induced grouping modulate the flanker compatibility effect?: A failure to replicate Driver & Baylis.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 1993
- Allocation of attention in the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1985
- Global precedence in attention and decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981
- Estimating the Dimension of a ModelThe Annals of Statistics, 1978
- Structural aspects of visual similarityMemory & Cognition, 1978