The Net Reclassification Index (NRI): A Misleading Measure of Prediction Improvement Even with Independent Test Data Sets
- 23 August 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Statistics in Biosciences
- Vol. 7 (2) , 282-295
Abstract
The Net Reclassification Index (NRI) is a very popular measure for evaluating the improvement in prediction performance gained by adding a marker to a set of baseline predictors. However, the statistical properties of this novel measure have not been explored in depth. We demonstrate the alarming result that the NRI statistic calculated on a large test dataset using risk models derived from a training set is likely to be positive even when the new marker has no predictive information. A related theoretical example is provided in which an incorrect risk function that includes an uninformative marker is proven to erroneously yield a positive NRI. Some insight into this phenomenon is provided. Since large values for the NRI statistic may simply be due to use of poorly fitting risk models, we suggest caution in using the NRI as the basis for marker evaluation. Other measures of prediction performance improvement, such as measures derived from the receiver operating characteristic curve, the net benefit function, and the Brier score, cannot be large due to poorly fitting risk functions.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- CommentaryEpidemiology, 2014
- Net Reclassification Indices for Evaluating Risk Prediction InstrumentsEpidemiology, 2014
- A note on the evaluation of novel biomarkers: do not rely on integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification indexStatistics in Medicine, 2013
- Multicategory reclassification statistics for assessing improvements in diagnostic accuracyBiostatistics, 2012
- Evaluating a New Marker for Risk Prediction Using the Test Tradeoff: An UpdateThe International Journal of Biostatistics, 2012
- Evaluating the Incremental Value of New Biomarkers With Integrated Discrimination ImprovementAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- Using Relative Utility Curves to Evaluate Risk PredictionJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2009
- Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyondStatistics in Medicine, 2007
- Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and EstimationJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2007
- The Elements of Statistical Learning2001