Evaluation of student perceptions with 2 interprofessional assessment tools—the Collaborative Healthcare Interdisciplinary Relationship Planning instrument and the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale—following didactic and clinical learning experiences in the United States
Open Access
- 5 November 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute in Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
- Vol. 16, 35
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated changes in students’ attitudes using 2 validated interprofessional survey instruments—the Collaborative Healthcare Interdisciplinary Relationship Planning (CHIRP) instrument and the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale (IPAS)—before and after didactic and clinical cohorts.Methods: Students from 7 colleges/schools participated in didactic and clinical cohorts during the 2017–2018 year. Didactic cohorts experienced 2 interactive sessions 6 months apart, while clinical cohorts experienced 4 outpatient clinical sessions once monthly. For the baseline and post-cohort assessments, 865 students were randomly assigned to complete either the 14-item CHIRP or the 27-item IPAS. The Pittman test using permutations of linear ranks was used to determine differences in the score distribution between the baseline and post-cohort assessments. Pooled results were compared for the CHIRP total score and the IPAS total and subdomain scores. For each score, 3 comparisons were made simultaneously: overall baseline versus post-didactic cohort, overall baseline versus post-clinical cohort, and post-didactic cohort versus post-clinical cohort. Alpha was adjusted to 0.0167 to account for simultaneous comparisons.Results: The baseline and post-cohort survey response rates were 62.4% and 65.9% for CHIRP and 58.7% and 58.1% for IPAS, respectively. The post-clinical cohort scores for the IPAS subdomain of teamwork, roles, and responsibilities were significantly higher than the baseline and post-didactic cohort scores. No differences were seen for the remaining IPAS subdomain scores or the CHIRP instrument total score.Conclusion: The IPAS instrument may discern changes in student attitudes in the subdomain of teamwork, roles, and responsibilities following short-term clinical experiences involving diverse interprofessional team members.Keywords
Funding Information
- Wisdom Family Foundation Inc
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Addressing the Interprofessional Collaboration Competencies of the Association of American Medical Colleges: A Systematic Review of Assessment Instruments in Undergraduate Medical EducationAcademic Medicine, 2016
- The Development and Validation of the Interprofessional Attitudes ScaleAcademic Medicine, 2015
- Interprofessional education and practice guide No. 4: Developing and sustaining interprofessional education at an academic health centerJournal of Interprofessional Care, 2015
- The current state of academic centers for interprofessional educationJournal of Interprofessional Care, 2015
- Recommendations from recent graduates in medicine, nursing and pharmacy on improving interprofessional education in university programs: a qualitative studyBMC Medical Education, 2014
- Interprofessional education accreditation standards in the USA: A comparative analysisJournal of Interprofessional Care, 2012
- Concurrent validation of CHIRP, a new instrument for measuring healthcare student attitudes towards interdisciplinary teamwork.2012
- Kirkpatrick’s levels and education ‘evidence’Medical Education, 2011
- Teamwork training with nursing and medical students: does the method matter? Results of an interinstitutional, interdisciplinary collaborationBMJ Quality & Safety, 2010
- Best Practices for Survey Research Reports Revisited: Implications of Target Population, Probability Sampling, and Response RateAmerican Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2009