Competing Effects of Elastic Heterogeneity and Viscous Flow on Interseismic Coupling at Cascadia
Open Access
- 23 August 2026
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Geophysical Research Letters
- Vol. 53 (16)
Abstract
Interseismic coupling maps are important tools for estimating future earthquake hazard at subduction zones. Often interseismic coupling is estimated from surface velocities using a homogeneous elastic Earth model. However, inversions that incorporate viscoelastic mantle flow or elastic heterogeneity show that each can change the spatial distribution and magnitude of estimated coupling. We present here a Bayesian inversion of surface deformation for the boundaries of coupling zones at the Cascadia subduction zone that incorporates both elastic heterogeneity and a viscoelastic earthquake cycle model. We find that elastic heterogeneity deepens inferred coupling and worsens fit to surface deformation compared to homogeneous elastic models, but viscoelasticity partly offsets these effects and yields similar coupling and a better fit to the vertical data than homogeneous elastic models. We also find that, of all geometries and viscosities tested, downgoing plate thickness and oceanic mantle viscosity have the greatest impact on modeled displacements and coupling.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (EAR‐2121631)
- National Science Foundation (EAR‐2045291)
- National Science Foundation (EAR‐2225286)
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Near full locking on the shallow megathrust of the central Cascadia subduction zone revealed by GNSS-AcousticEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 2025
- Postseismic uplift of the Andes following the 2010 Maule earthquake: Implications for mantle rheologyGeophysical Research Letters, 2017
- Resolving depth-dependent subduction zone viscosity and afterslip from postseismic displacements following the 2011 Tohoku-oki, Japan earthquakeEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 2017
- Coupling on the northern Cascadia subduction zone from geodetic measurements and physics‐based modelsJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2016
- Small interseismic asperities and widespread aseismic creep on the northern Japan subduction interfaceGeophysical Research Letters, 2016
- Revisiting viscoelastic effects on interseismic deformation and locking degree: A case study of the Peru‐North Chile subduction zoneJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2015
- Central Cascadia subduction zone creepGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2014
- Coseismic and postseismic deformation of the 2011 Tohoku‐Oki earthquake constrained by GRACE gravimetryGeophysical Research Letters, 2012
- A viscoelastic and afterslip postseismic deformation model for the 1964 Alaska earthquakeJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2009
- Interseismic uplift rates for western Oregon and along‐strike variation in locking on the Cascadia subduction zoneJournal of Geophysical Research, 2009