Quality metrics in non-gynecologic cytology: results from the 2022 American Society of Cytopathology survey

This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:

• The Role of Monitoring Interpretive Rates, Concordance Between Cytotechnologist and Pathologist Interpretations Before Sign-Out, and Turnaround Time in Gynecologic Cytology Quality Assurance: Findings From the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference Working Group 1
  Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2013
• General Quality Practices in Gynecologic Cytopathology: Findings From the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference Working Group 3
  Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2013
• The atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance:malignant ratio
  Cancer Cytopathology, 2011
• Effectiveness of Random and Focused Review in Detecting Surgical Pathology Error
  American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2008
• Using the Rate of Positive High-Risk HPV Test Results for ASC-US Together With the ASC-US/SIL Ratio in Evaluating the Performance of Cytopathologists
  American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2008
• The ASC/SIL Ratio for Cytopathologists as a Quality Control Measure
  American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2007
• An Analysis of Factors That Influence the ASCUS/SIL Ratio of Pathologists
  American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2001
• Quality Assurance in Gynecologic Cytology
  American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2001
• Quality Assurance and Risk Reduction Guidelines
  Acta Cytologica, 2000
• Quality‐assurance study of simultaneously sampled, non‐correlating cervical cytology and biopsies
  Diagnostic Cytopathology, 1993