Press-fit vs. cemented humeral stem fixation for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 9.5 years
- 1 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
- Vol. 30 (1) , 72-79
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Elucidating trends in revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty procedures: a retrieval study evaluating clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes dataJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2015
- Uncemented versus cemented humeral stem fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplastyInternational Orthopaedics, 2014
- Clinical and radiographic results of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a comparative study with 2 to 5 years of follow-upJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2014
- Radiographic Changes Around Humeral Components in Shoulder ArthroplastyJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2014
- Evaluation of the role of glenosphere design and humeral component retroversion in avoiding scapular notching during reverse shoulder arthroplastyJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2014
- Revision surgery of reverse shoulder arthroplastyJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2013
- Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears in patients younger than 65 years old: results after five to fifteen yearsJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2013
- An evaluation of the radiological changes around the Grammont reverse geometry shoulder arthroplasty after eight to 12 yearsThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2011
- Reverse Prostheses in Arthropathies With Cuff Tear: Are Survivorship and Function Maintained Over Time?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuffThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2004