Repositories and communities at cross‐purposes: issues in sharing and reuse of digital learning resources
- 8 July 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
- Vol. 24 (4) , 333-347
Abstract
Abstract Globally, institutions are setting up digital repositories to support the sharing of resources for teaching and learning. The educational rationale is that a single set of resources can be restructured to support different pedagogical approaches and to achieve economies of scale. A key problem is that these learning object repositories (LORs), like many other learning technology innovations, are often designed to exploit the capabilities of technology rather than to meet learners' needs. The premise of this study is that the nature and organization of a community is likely to impact the way an LOR is used. Key dimensions of repositories and communities are discussed. Three repository systems are analysed to identify how communities use repositories. Guided by Activity Theory, the LORs and user communities are analysed as activity systems. These activity systems are compared and contradictions between them are identified. From the analysis, barriers and enablers for the use of LORs to support learning are discussed and a framework for addressing the key issues in the repository development stage is proposed.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Characterising effective eLearning resourcesComputers & Education, 2008
- CULTURAL ISSUES IN THE SHARING AND REUSE OF RESOURCES FOR LEARNINGResearch and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2006
- Creating an information‐rich learning environment to enhance design student learning: challenges and approachesBritish Journal of Educational Technology, 2005
- The trouble with learning objectsEducational Technology Research and Development, 2004
- Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environmentsEducational Technology Research and Development, 1999
- Communities of Practice1998