Unraveling paralog‐specific Notch signaling through thermodynamics of ternary complex formation and transcriptional activation of chimeric receptors

Authors:
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Notch signaling in humans is mediated by four paralogous receptors that share conserved architectures and possess overlapping, yet non‐redundant functions. The receptors share a canonical activation pathway wherein upon extracellular ligand binding, the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) is cleaved from the membrane and translocates to the nucleus where its N‐terminal RBP‐j‐associated molecule (RAM) region and ankyrin repeat (ANK) domain bind transcription factor CSL and recruit co‐activator Mastermind‐like‐1 (MAML1) to activate transcription. However, different paralogs can lead to distinct outcomes. To better understand paralog‐specific differences in Notch signaling, we performed a thermodynamic analysis of the Notch transcriptional activation complexes for all four Notch paralogs using isothermal titration calorimetry. Using chimeric constructs, we find that the RAM region is the primary determinant of stability of binary RAMANK:CSL complexes, and that the ANK regions are largely the determinants of MAML1 binding to pre‐formed RAMANK:CSL complexes. Free energies of these binding reactions (ΔGRA and ΔGMAML) vary among the four Notch paralogs, although variations for Notch2, 3, and 4 offset in the free energy of the ternary complex (ΔGTC, where ΔGTC = ΔGRA + ΔGMAML). To probe how these affinity differences affect Notch signaling, we performed transcriptional activation assays with the paralogous and chimeric NICDs, and analyzed the results with an independent multiplicative model that quantifies contributions of the paralogous RAM, ANK, and C‐terminal regions (CTR) to activation. This analysis shows that transcription activation correlates with ΔGTC, but that activation is further modified by CTR identity in a paralog‐specific way.
Funding Information
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences

This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit: