Comparison of Allergic Rhinitis Treatments on Utilities and Quality of Life: A MASK ‐air Study
Authors:
- Nuno Lourenço‐SilvaNLNuno Lourenço‐Silva
- Bernardo Sousa‐PintoBSBernardo Sousa‐Pinto
- Antonio BognanniABAntonio Bognanni
- Ana Margarida PereiraAPAna Margarida Pereira
- João Coutinho‐AlmeidaJCJoão Coutinho‐Almeida
- Mattia GiovanniniMGMattia Giovannini
- Bilun GemiciogluBGBilun Gemicioglu
- Desiree E. Larenas‐LinnemannDLDesiree E. Larenas‐Linnemann
Open Access
- 6 May 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical & Experimental Allergy
- Vol. 56 (8) , 904-913
Abstract
Background: Allergic rhinitis displays a relevant impact on quality of life. Medications used in the treatment of rhinitis have been assessed on their impact on rhinoconjunctivitis‐related quality of life, but not on generic health‐related quality of life metrics, such as utilities or EQ‐5D visual analogue scale (VAS) levels. This study aimed to compare different medication classes and individual medications on utilities and EQ‐5D VAS levels using data from a mobile app. Methods: We conducted an observational study using direct patient data from the MASK‐air mobile application, collected between May 2015 and December 2024. We compared rhinitis medication classes and individual medications on health utilities (computed from the EQ‐5D‐5L questionnaire) and the EQ‐5D VAS. To account for confounding, we employed inverse probability treatment weighting based on propensity scores, adjusting for demographics, baseline symptom control, and asthma status. Results: The study analysed 69,973 observations with EQ‐5D VAS data and 842 observations with utility data. At the medication class level, fixed combinations of intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids were associated with improvements in EQ‐5D VAS (mean difference = 1.900; 95% CI = 1.316–2.484) and utilities (mean difference = 0.022; 95% CI = −0.015 to 0.059) compared with oral antihistamines (OAH). Intranasal antihistamines were associated with lower EQ‐5D VAS and utility scores than other intranasal treatments. For individual medications, mometasone was associated with a lower EQ‐5D VAS than budesonide and fluticasone furoate, while fexofenadine and levocetirizine tended to be associated with lower VAS values than other OAH. Conclusion: Fixed combinations of intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids were associated with better quality‐of‐life than oral antihistamines and intranasal antihistamines. These findings could support future cost‐effectiveness analyses.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Concurrent validity, cut‐offs and ability to change of patient‐reported outcome measures for rhinitis and asthma in MASK‐air®Clinical and Translational Allergy, 2024
- Intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids in allergic rhinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysisJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2024
- Digitally‐enabled, patient‐centred care in rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity: The ARIA‐MASK‐air®approachClinical and Translational Allergy, 2023
- Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of daily monitoring visual analog scales in MASK‐air®Clinical and Translational Allergy, 2021
- Systematic review of measures of disease severity in rhinitisInternational Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, 2021
- Rhinitis 2020: A practice parameter updateJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2020
- Mobile technology offers novel insights into the control and treatment of allergic rhinitis: The MASK studyJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2019
- Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines—2016 revisionJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2017
- Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studiesStatistics in Medicine, 2015
- Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost‐utility analysis?Health Economics, 2006