Magnetic resonance tumour regression grade and pathological correlates in patients with rectal cancer
Authors:
- 12 June 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 105 (12) , 1671-1679
Abstract
Background: Evidence to support the specific use of magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) is inadequate. The aim of this study was to investigate the pathological characteristics of mrTRG after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer and the implications for surgery. Methods: Patients undergoing long-course CRT (45–50 Gy plus a booster dose of 4–6 Gy) for mid or low rectal cancer (cT3−4 or cN+ without metastasis) between 2011 and 2015 who had post-CRT rectal MRI before surgery were included retrospectively. Three board-certified experienced radiologists assessed mrTRG. mrTRG was correlated with pathological tumour regression grade (pTRG), ypT and ypN. In a subgroup of patients with mrTRG1−2 and no tumour spread (such as nodal metastasis) on MRI, the projected rate of completion total mesorectal excision (TME) if they underwent transanal excision (TAE) and had a ypT status of ypT2 or higher was estimated, and recurrence-free survival was calculated according to the operation (TME or TAE) that patients had actually received. Results: Some 439 patients (290 men and 149 women of mean(s.d.) age 62·2(11·4) years) were analysed. The accuracy of mrTRG1 for predicting pTRG1 was 61 per cent (40 of 66), and that for ypT1 or less was 74 per cent (49 of 66). For mrTRG2, these values were 22·3 per cent (25 of 112) and 36·6 per cent (41 of 112) respectively. Patients with mrTRG1 and mrTRG2 without tumour spread were ypN+ in 3 per cent (1 of 29) and 16 per cent (8 of 50) respectively. Assuming mrTRG1 or mrTRG1−2 with no tumour spread on post-CRT MRI as the criteria for TAE, the projected completion TME rate was 26 per cent (11 of 43) and 41·0 per cent (41 of 100) respectively. For the 100 patients with mrTRG1–2 and no tumour spread, recurrence-free survival did not differ significantly between TME (79 patients) and TAE (21) (adjusted hazard ratio 1·86, 95 per cent c.i. 0·42 to 8·18). Conclusion: Patients with mrTRG1 without tumour spread may be suitable for TAE.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Organ preservation for rectal cancer (GRECCAR 2): a prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trialThe Lancet, 2017
- Organ preservation with local excision or active surveillance following chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancerBritish Journal of Cancer, 2016
- Long-term Outcome of an Organ Preservation Program After Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal CancerJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2016
- Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysisThe Lancet Oncology, 2016
- High-dose chemoradiotherapy and watchful waiting for distal rectal cancer: a prospective observational studyThe Lancet Oncology, 2015
- Preoperative Versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 Randomized Phase III Trial After a Median Follow-Up of 11 YearsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2012
- Preoperative Multimodality Therapy Improves Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Carcinoma of the Rectum: NSABP R-03Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trialThe Lancet, 2009
- Preoperative Radiotherapy With or Without Concurrent Fluorouracil and Leucovorin in T3-4 Rectal Cancers: Results of FFCD 9203Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Preoperative versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004